• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Belief in biblical end-times stifling climate change action in U.S.: study

BlueWolf47

Senior member
The United States has failed to take action to mitigate climate change thanks in part to the large number of religious Americans who believe the world has a set expiration date.

Research by David C. Barker of the University of Pittsburgh and David H. Bearce of the University of Colorado uncovered that belief in the biblical end-times was a motivating factor behind resistance to curbing climate change.

“[T]he fact that such an overwhelming percentage of Republican citizens profess a belief in the Second Coming (76 percent in 2006, according to our sample) suggests that governmental attempts to curb greenhouse emissions would encounter stiff resistance even if every Democrat in the country wanted to curb them,” Barker and Bearce wrote in their study, which will be published in the June issue of Political Science Quarterly.

The study, based on data from the 2007 Cooperative Congressional Election Study, uncovered that belief in the “Second Coming” of Jesus reduced the probability of strongly supporting government action on climate change by 12 percent when controlling for a number of demographic and cultural factors. When the effects of party affiliation, political ideology, and media distrust were removed from the analysis, the belief in the “Second Coming” increased this effect by almost 20 percent.

“t stands to reason that most nonbelievers would support preserving the Earth for future generations, but that end-times believers would rationally perceive such efforts to be ultimately futile, and hence ill-advised,” Barker and Bearce explained.

That very sentiment has been expressed by federal legislators. Rep. John Shimkus (R-IL) said in 2010 that he opposed action on climate change because “the Earth will end only when God declares it to be over.” He is the chairman of the Subcommittee on Environment and the Economy.

Though the two researchers cautioned their study was not intended to predict future policy outcomes, they said their study suggested it was unlikely the United States would take action on climate change while so many Americans, particularly Republicans, believed in the coming end-times.

“That is, because of institutions such as the Electoral College, the winner-take-all representation mechanism, and the Senate filibuster, as well as the geographic distribution of partisanship to modern partisan polarization, minority interests often successfully block majority preferences,” Barker and Bearce wrote. “Thus, even if the median voter supports policies designed to slow global warming, legislation to effect such change could find itself dead on arrival if the median Republican voter strongly resists public policy environmentalism at least in part because of end-times beliefs.”

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/05/...-stifling-climate-change-action-in-u-s-study/
source journal article: http://prq.sagepub.com/content/66/2/267.abstract?etoc
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



So basically 76% of the republican party is batshit crazy? Don't worry Jesus will be here before climate change buttfucks the earth.
 
Last edited:
Makes total sense.

“the Earth will end only when God declares it to be over.” Rep. John Shimkus (R-IL) Chairman of the Subcommittee on Environment and the Economy

Evolution, embryology, and the Big Bang theory are “lies straight from the pit of hell" Paul Broun (R-GA) House Science, Space and Technology Committee

Rep. Lamar Smith defends tentative changes to research funding
http://www.latimes.com/news/politic...deral-research-funding-20130501,0,78113.story
 
Last edited:
Great, now that you've got commentary, climate change is so yesterday. Everyone has moved on. The whole concept of global warming climate change has been discredited and discounted. This article, this thread, would have garnered a lot of interest here two or three years ago. Now, people have become more educated.

Earth_Day_Protection_Racket.jpg
 
Except they got their degree at Holy Rollers Apocalypse Now Uni.
Mercy, you worried about some climate change??? lol When the Lord starts raining down fire from heaven, you gonna forget that shat

Don't forget that Muslims want to take over the world to kill all the Jews.

If you want to have fun and play with the troll that's fine. This might be the thread to do it in.
 
Don't forget that Muslims want to take over the world to kill all the Jews.

If you want to have fun and play with the troll that's fine. This might be the thread to do it in.

Muslims taking over the world comes from the same guys who think Jesus is going to save us
 
All this skepticism and climate change disinformation, mainly from well funded groups such as American's for prosperity, will continue to get more and more batshit republican candidates elected. But luckily, most of their base is 65 and older so, with time, they will be food for the worms.

Frontline : Climate of Doubt is a great PBS documentary that investigates climate change skeptic groups and how they have been so effective in shaping public opinion. Its definitely worth a watch if you haven't seen it.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/climate-of-doubt/
 
All this skepticism and climate change disinformation, mainly from well funded groups such as American's for prosperity, will continue to get more and more batshit republican candidates elected. But luckily, most of their base is 65 and older so, with time, they will be food for the worms.

Frontline : Climate of Doubt is a great PBS documentary that investigates climate change skeptic groups and how they have been so effective in shaping public opinion. Its definitely worth a watch if you haven't seen it.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/climate-of-doubt/

And this study isn't throwing out disinformation? Does the person who did the study also realize people who resist even more environmental regulation might also be more likely to oppose higher taxes? It's called politics. The left follow their handbook just like the right does.
 
Let's stop the bullshit before it makes 100 posts,

The constant planned obsolescence consumerism type mentality all in the name of corporate profits needs to be addressed, because that is the driving force behind most of our environmental problems, and they use mostly liberal Hollywood movies and television to brainwash Americans in what to buy, believe, and think not religion.

http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/light-bulb-conspiracy/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s7EwXmxpExw

The reason environmental threats are purposely ignored is because it would affect the corporate bottom line, the so called religious folks are just fair weather christian patsies used by these same corporate types.

Then we have the so called liberal do gooders who would heap regulation after regulation on American companies in order to reduce pollution but don't think twice about buying the cheaper product made in China where people live in constant smog and pollution with abysmal labor and safety standards.
 
Let's stop the bullshit before it makes 100 posts,

The constant planned obsolescence consumerism type mentality all in the name of corporate profits needs to be addressed, because that is the driving force behind most of our environmental problems, and they use mostly liberal Hollywood movies and television to brainwash Americans in what to buy, believe, and think not religion.

http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/light-bulb-conspiracy/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s7EwXmxpExw

The reason environmental threats are purposely ignored is because it would affect the corporate bottom line, the so called religious folks are just fair weather christian patsies used by these same corporate types.

Then we have the so called liberal do gooders who would heap regulation after regulation on American companies in order to reduce pollution but don't think twice about buying the cheaper product made in China where people live in constant smog and pollution with abysmal labor and safety standards.

What's the difference anyways? We just regulate the shit out of our own corporations demanding they make products without damaging the environment. Then when it comes time to pony up a few extra cents to purchase those products on the market due to those regulations we just turn around and buy from China.
 
The reason environmental threats are purposely ignored is because it would affect the corporate bottom line, the so called religious folks are just fair weather christian patsies used by these same corporate types.

Then we have the so called liberal do gooders who would heap regulation after regulation on American companies in order to reduce pollution but don't think twice about buying the cheaper product made in China where people live in constant smog and pollution with abysmal labor and safety standards.

Ain't that the truth.
I'm defiantly guilty, because I always take the cheapest route

Half my family works for oil companies, the other half works in parks and environment, and wind power
Hopefully all together, we strike some kind of balance 😉
 
And this study isn't throwing out disinformation? Does the person who did the study also realize people who resist even more environmental regulation might also be more likely to oppose higher taxes? It's called politics. The left follow their handbook just like the right does.

Of course its for the purpose of deregulation. But with regards to climate change, the right has no rational argument to refute climate change, so instead they have created a false narrative of dis-consensus among scientists in order to protect the profits of corporations. These are the same corporations that lobbied for citizens united. If we had campaign finance reform, it would be harder these crazy politicians to get elected.
 
Last edited:
Climate change isn't man-made and no amount of carbon taxes and bigger government will stop it. BUT it is BS that people use the Bible to reject climate change instead of science.
 
The whole concept of global warming climate change has been discredited and discounted.

You realize that just because you make a statement it doesn't automatically become true. The only scientists who say its been "discredited and discounted" are on the payroll of Exxon or the Heritage Foundation.
 
Back
Top