• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

being born a white male

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
The super wealthy are parasites who live off of the workers labor. There is no need for them.


They produce nothing but hoarding, and sow divisive class/religious/race warfare to play the working classes off of one another for their own benefit.


The more super rich you have living off the masses, the more poverty/misery the majority live in.

It's all about who has the power to buy the media and politicians and frame the debate.

This is why people laugh their asses off when righties say the government panders to the poor.

Why in reality would someone pander to folks with no political power? This is propaganda fed to you by the elite parasite class taking you for a ride.

Sometimes people just have no sense of their own best interests and fall for it.

Pretty sad state of the working class in the USA.

To keep the super rich from having nothing else to do with all that money but subvert a society with all that pointless wealth -to get more just because they can- is make them actually have to take RISKS and be personally accountable for their actions.

This promotes innovation instead of the inevitable plutocracy and corruption time and time again that drives a society/democracy into dysfunction.

Sooner or later the plebes will get sick of the "let them eat cake" BS and eat the rich themselves.

The history of human civilization shows this time and time again.

Paris Hilton and even our own Aristocrat420 are great examples of how useless/arrogant the rich are.

A damn shame, what money does to people, literally economic thugs, the sad part is they have almost no vision with all that entitlement and lack of struggle to show for their lifetimes.

While I agree we should increase taxes on both the wealthy and even more so on the super wealthy, this viewpoint is both ignorant and counter productive. The super wealthy contribute nothing? Bill Gates has contributed nothing? Steve Jobs contributed nothing? Warrent Buffet has contributed nothing? Larry Ellison has contributed nothing? Charles Koch has contributed nothing? Michael Bloomberg, Jeff Bezos, Sergey Brin, Larry Page, Steve Balmer. No, these guys have never worked a day in their collective lives. America would have been so much better off without them.
 
OP's view of all white people 300 years ago

tumblr_ln2d4nmYPG1qkopl7o1_500.png


The reality for 95%...

irish-peasants.jpg
 
While I agree we should increase taxes on both the wealthy and even more so on the super wealthy, this viewpoint is both ignorant and counter productive. The super wealthy contribute nothing? Bill Gates has contributed nothing?

A perfect example. The public basically forced him to up the PR through donations to charities and suing his ass for monopolistic practices.

Rich folks don't give/spend money, unless it servers their interests to get more money or keep up the hustle.

That's why they are rich.

Do you really think Bill Gates innovated? He was a software thug that stole others work and labor to get where he is.

It would be a interesting world if people who usually are so critical of the poor to be the same way to the rich, instead of lionizing theft and corruption.

This is why the myth of capitalism is a class warfare scam. Same as it ever was 500 years ago.

The "free market" fundamentalism is pseudo-religious nonsense, passed down to the serfs from our lords of industry trying to keep up the scam.
 
Last edited:
The rich are like everyone else. Some of them work hard. Some of them are very generous. Some of them are lazy. And plenty of them are douchebags.

300 years ago...

The whites are like everyone else. Some of them work hard. Some of them are very generous. Some of them are lazy. And plenty of them are douchebags.

None of that justified them getting so many advantages over the minorities, and it was rightfully changed.

Fine. What do we do when there is no more super-wealthy? Increase it on the plain old wealthy?

You clearly have no idea how much money the rich have. If the super wealthy 1% was taxed out of existence, that would simply mean that their excessive wealth is now better distributed. The government does a lot of things poorly, but taking money from one man and splitting it among many men is ultimately a net gain for society, no matter how inefficiently it is done.

EDIT: And your in Arlington? By chance were you near the Walmart on Rt 1 about a week or so ago around midnight?

Arlington doesn't have a Walmart. Maybe you have us confused with the trashy parts of Alexandria.


White males born 300 years ago didn't have to do any physical work? You are an idiot and I hate you.
[and 123123 posts that say the same thing]

Correct. They don't have to do any physical work. It's a choice some made to do labor for a living, but it was always a choice. Unlike the many slaves, who had no choice at all.

The fact that so many choose to pick apart this minor detail instead of arguing against my basic premises shows just how brainwashed people have become.

You don't even care the the rich born into wealth basically live as kings while the poor are their slaves, but you care that I implied some minor detail that isn't true. You are just hopping at the chance to defend your rich masters so that perhaps you can somehow gain their favor in the future.
 
I think you overreached in your attempt to draw parallels.

He's overreached by about 6 alternate realities. How could anyone possibly think white people didn't work back then? He'd be calling for his momma if he had to work half as hard. Don't they teach history anymore?
 
300 years ago...

The whites are like everyone else. Some of them work hard. Some of them are very generous. Some of them are lazy. And plenty of them are douchebags.

None of that justified them getting so many advantages over the minorities, and it was rightfully changed.



You clearly have no idea how much money the rich have. If the super wealthy 1% was taxed out of existence, that would simply mean that their excessive wealth is now better distributed. The government does a lot of things poorly, but taking money from one man and splitting it among many men is ultimately a net gain for society, no matter how inefficiently it is done.



Arlington doesn't have a Walmart. Maybe you have us confused with the trashy parts of Alexandria.



[and 123123 posts that say the same thing]

Correct. They don't have to do any physical work. It's a choice some made to do labor for a living, but it was always a choice. Unlike the many slaves, who had no choice at all.

The fact that so many choose to pick apart this minor detail instead of arguing against my basic premises shows just how brainwashed people have become.

You don't even care the the rich born into wealth basically live as kings while the poor are their slaves, but you care that I implied some minor detail that isn't true. You are just hopping at the chance to defend your rich masters so that perhaps you can somehow gain their favor in the future.

Holy shit. Working was optional? The vast majority worked or starved. Let us know what school you attended so we dont send our kids there.
 
I live better than kings 300 yrs ago
I'm never hungry or cold, I could cirumvent the globe tonight of I chose, Many of the diseases that could kill me are known and treatable. I want for nothing and I'm an avg wage slave
 
300 years ago...

A white male was born with huge advantages. He never had to do any physical work, there were always slaves or servants to do those sorts of things. Never have to do his own cooking. Never had to worry about being stuck in the cold or without shelter.

You really don't know anything about anything, do you? Almost everyone back then, other than a select few, lived a miserable existence where they barely scraped by.
 
Arlington doesn't have a Walmart. Maybe you have us confused with the trashy parts of Alexandria.

Surely a poverty stricken individual such as yourself knows how to use public transportation.

Where were you about a week ago hmmmmhmm?

Midnight time frame. Remember a robbery with a hammer for some shoes?
 
The super wealthy are parasites who live off of the workers labor. There is no need for them.


They produce nothing but hoarding, and sow divisive class/religious/race warfare to play the working classes off of one another for their own benefit.


The more super rich you have living off the masses, the more poverty/misery the majority live in.

It's all about who has the power to buy the media and politicians and frame the debate.

This is why people laugh their asses off when righties say the government panders to the poor.

Why in reality would someone pander to folks with no political power? This is propaganda fed to you by the elite parasite class taking you for a ride.

Sometimes people just have no sense of their own best interests and fall for it.

Pretty sad state of the working class in the USA.

To keep the super rich from having nothing else to do with all that money but subvert a society with all that pointless wealth -to get more just because they can- is make them actually have to take RISKS and be personally accountable for their actions.

This promotes innovation instead of the inevitable plutocracy and corruption time and time again that drives a society/democracy into dysfunction.

Sooner or later the plebes will get sick of the "let them eat cake" BS and eat the rich themselves.

The history of human civilization shows this time and time again.

Paris Hilton and even our own Aristocrat420 are great examples of how useless/arrogant the rich are.

A damn shame, what money does to people, literally economic thugs, the sad part is they have almost no vision with all that entitlement and lack of struggle to show for their lifetimes.

h4h4h4h4h4h4h4h4h4h4h4h4h4h4h4h4h4h4h4h4h4h4h4h4h4h4h4h4h4h4h4h4h4h4h4h4h4h4h4h4h4h4h4h4h4h4h4h4h4h4h4h4h4h4h4h4h4
 
The rich have always had power, to varying degrees. It is not a modern phenomena.

Yes money is just another form of power. Even government and sovereignty is at the whims of money, for now, such as in Europe. The times are actually more interesting than alot realize.

Historically its a bit dicey, nothing good ever came of finance becoming a large chunk of the GDP. Reminds me of Great Britain when America seceded 🙂 They were on the same trend of finance rising as a portion of GDP, meanwhile their economy was actually doing nothing and the world sensed weakness and pounced 😛
 
Last edited:
I live better than kings 300 yrs ago
I'm never hungry or cold, I could cirumvent the globe tonight of I chose, Many of the diseases that could kill me are known and treatable. I want for nothing and I'm an avg wage slave

Kings had power way beyond money.
 
We need over 100% tax rates on super wealthy WHITE wealth. They can avoid a wealth tax by showing that their money isn't just white colonial money, those people need their wealth actually removed, not just the rate of growth slowed. If they are just super wealthy but were self-made or immigrated after the founding of this nation, then just very high tax rates to slow the progression.

The white man's burden needs to actually become a reality, not something they just pay lip service to while they horde gold like a dragon at the top of the mountain.
 
Back
Top