Oh look another yearly release military themed shooter. So exciting.
we get it, you don't like fps.
Game looks amazing, but why release it for current gen right before next gen comes out?
I'd imagine this'll come out for next gen as well, but who would spend $60 a month before spending another $60 to get it on the next gen systems?
Oh I like FPS, just generally anything that has a number after it greater than 2 or sells in the millions is pretty much guaranteed to suck.
Because Battlefield 5 or Battlefield 4 HD will be a launch title with next gen. Why not sell it twice? That's how it works today.
Serious question? Same people who like spending money on the same game every 6 months. Eg same people who would buy this kind of game in the first place.
You sure are ornery.
I'm saying as someone who likes this genre and intends to buy a next gen system as soon as its available, I'm finding it tough to justify buying the current gen version of this game with a guaranteed year of map support coming behind it that I'll never touch if I've moved onto the next gen version. The vast majority I would imagine would feel this way, unless they have zero intention of moving onto the new consoles in the 6-12 months following.
I guess this is how all console transitions go, but it just feels real odd. You're right there though, milking the current gen people I guess, if they intend to stay. As long as the game isn't limited on next gen because of current's limitations, ie. player count.
BF2 alleviated this by having different maps and different servers. The Xbox version was vastly different from the Xbox 360 version IIRC. My friend had both for some reason.TBH it makes perfect sense to release it on current and next gen. millions more people are willing to spend 60$ on a game vs 60$ + 400$ for a new console
but the fear that its held back is there, the PS3 and Xbox struggle with 24 player maps now
