- Jul 28, 2004
- 2,618
- 5
- 81
How dare you modify a game you paid for. You're supposed to enjoy the games provided to you, and buy the new one in 8 months.
Sad indeed, they have strange priorities, but I'm not surprised.
I'm glad I never bought BF3 (nor even played at all). For me the Battlefield craze stopped when I finally got bored of BF2 (although I did enjoy BF2 for quite a while). Just out of curiosity, was there any similar seemingly benign modifications that ever existed for Battlefield 2 which would also result in a ban? Or is that some sort of a new policy (or idiocy I'd rather call it) for BF3 only?
Same.I didnt mind the blue tint. Sun glare on the other hand...
LOL at people complaining about color grading.......as if the point of any form of visual art (cinema, games, painting, whatever) is even remotely about creating realistic color representation.
Yeah....that's why I didn't like "300," because the colors weren't realistic. :whiste:
The underlying issue here is that many people are speaking out against many of BF3's design decisions...today, it just happens to be a focus on the tint/graphics, and they do this instead of admitting that a lot of people don't like blue tint.
It's a good thing I'm enjoying Planetside 2, which while it doesn't undo every bad decision of BF3 (you gotta cater to the masses in SOME way), it strikes a great balance.
BF2 had mod tools I think...I don't know if 2142 did but certainly by BC2, DICE was backtracking and claiming that "modding is a declining trend".
Wow, your lack of common sense/over abundance of ignorance is absolutely amazing. Kudos to anyone with the amount of patience required to being stuck with you
http://i.imgur.com/HNt6F.jpg
fixing the color is not the reason for the bans.. but if you want to believe that.. no amount of reasoning will change your mind.. a simple color change is fine.. but to many take advantage and mod it farther to enhance spotting ability.. its the old problem, you let one guy change it so it looks differnt but doesnt thurt gameplay, somebody else will fook with it and twist it so they have an advantage.. Hence.. you cant allow any of it.. people on the internet cant detirmin fair boundries so the game companies have to. if the game was 100% hacked nobody would play. Of course since nobody looks at anything with realistic eyes on the net.. SCREW DICE!
fixing the color is not the reason for the bans.. but if you want to believe that.. no amount of reasoning will change your mind.. a simple color change is fine.. but to many take advantage and mod it farther to enhance spotting ability.. its the old problem, you let one guy change it so it looks differnt but doesnt thurt gameplay, somebody else will fook with it and twist it so they have an advantage.. Hence.. you cant allow any of it.. people on the internet cant detirmin fair boundries so the game companies have to. if the game was 100% hacked nobody would play. Of course since nobody looks at anything with realistic eyes on the net.. SCREW DICE!
The fact that it's a modification is incidental. DICE defends their art design no matter how many people say they don't like it.
That said, enhancing spotting ability? You can already just hit Q to locate people you didn't know were there. Only full out wallhacks are going to give you better than what's built in to dumb down the game. Fortunately Planetside 2, while doing SOME of these dumbdowns, isn't going too crazy about it.
Seriously. The game already has legal wallhacks. There is no difference at all.
Furthurmore, to the guy who says it seems like amateur photography, the HDR setting isn't changed AT ALL. The game literally has a blue filter above the game. The game is rendered normally with color, and then just has a blue hue added to it. It looks terrible.
Dice refuses to make good changes and continues to perpetuate the shit that is BF3.