Battlefield 3 and GPU upgrade

Jacky60

Golden Member
Jan 3, 2010
1,123
0
0

Dribble

Platinum Member
Aug 9, 2005
2,076
611
136
Early trailers of COD : MW looked more impressive imo and that ran fine on an 8800GT. Not that you can really tell anything from about 10 seconds of low quality video anyway.
 

RussianSensation

Elite Member
Sep 5, 2003
19,458
765
126
The best advice anyone can give you is to wait until the game is released. Not only will you have an exact idea of how your current hardware will perform, but the videocard landscape will have changed. By the time the game is released, prices will change and/or some faster videocards will be around. There is no guarantee either that the game will ship on time, making any current recommendation worthless. Half life 2 anyone?
 

Qbah

Diamond Member
Oct 18, 2005
3,754
10
81
A HD5970 is faster than a GTX580. 1.5xHD5970 shouldn't be noticeably slower than 2xGTX580, arguably the fastest setup you can get today.

You should be fine, especially since we don't really know what kind of hardware is needed to run those two games maxed. Not to mention there's hardly anything faster than what you have right now...
 

nanaki333

Diamond Member
Sep 14, 2002
3,772
13
81
anything you get that's out now will be a side-grade. i guess 3x 6970 will give you a little boost due to better scaling.... but not worth the hassle. wait til it comes out like everyone else said.
 
May 13, 2009
12,333
612
126
Elder Scrolls 3, crysis 2, Battlefield 3. I thought they said pc gaming was dead? This is shaping up to be one of the best yet.:)
 

notty22

Diamond Member
Jan 1, 2010
3,375
0
0
Elder Scrolls 3, crysis 2, Battlefield 3. I thought they said pc gaming was dead? This is shaping up to be one of the best yet.:)

Dirt 3, NFS Shift 2, Witcher 2 as well. Wish they would all get here before the Hot Weather !
 

dudeofdur

Member
Sep 29, 2008
110
0
0
Elder Scrolls 3, crysis 2, Battlefield 3. I thought they said pc gaming was dead? This is shaping up to be one of the best yet.:)

you got to keep in mind that they're releasing these for consoles too. I'm a pc gamer myself but in games such as dragon age etc it feels that the developers just half a55ed the port from console to pc which is unacceptable.
 

bunnyfubbles

Lifer
Sep 3, 2001
12,248
3
0
Its not just about whether he'll need to, its also about whether or not he will want to.

That being said, 3 x 5870s will trump just about any other possible solution outside of spending a redonkulous amount for at best a trivial boost when strictly considering today's options...

Since the game is due out in Q4 there's a good chance we'll see newer cards by then with both nVidia's Kepler and AMD's Southern Islands still on track for that time frame.

I know I'm eying Kepler as I use CUDA, although I don't really need more power than one of my single 470s for that purpose so I suppose either would do if I create just a gaming specific rig separate from my work one. At any rate we really don't know enough about either to even begin to make a guess as to which might even be close to having the upper hand in performance or features or price or specifically for BF3.
 
Last edited:

Edrick

Golden Member
Feb 18, 2010
1,939
230
106
Just always upgrade to the latest and greatest and you will be ready for any game at any time. And never have to ask if your rig can handle it.
 

Vdubchaos

Lifer
Nov 11, 2009
10,408
10
0
I wait for game to be released. Then even if I buy it, I play it on current set up.

If I like it A LOT > I upgrade.

I try never to skip above.....or my wallet hates me.
 

Mr. President

Member
Feb 6, 2011
124
2
81
I'd be highly surprised if either game even comes close to bringing your system to its knees. Keep in mind that Elder Scrolls will almost certainly be a console centric game and that the BF3 engine will likely be an incremental upgrade over its current incarnation.

The only exception would be if BF3 scales poorly to a triple GPU configuration. Not only is it doubtful but, quite simply, no one outside of DICE knows.
 

Baasha

Golden Member
Jan 4, 2010
1,989
20
81
You have a 5970 (dual-GPU) and a 5870 OC'd. I don't think you'll have too much of an issue running BF3 on high settings. The only question is, what resolution(s) are you going to be gaming at?

If you're gaming with anything less than a 30" monitor, you will be absolutely fine. If you're doing 30" or more, then perhaps get dual 6990s (CrossFire) or dual GTX-590/595 (SLI) and you'll own Frostbite 2.
 

james1701

Golden Member
Sep 14, 2007
1,791
34
91
Did you read the Game Informer article on BF 3? How hard is the ANT engine on equipment? As of right now, the entire map is destructible.
 

Jacky60

Golden Member
Jan 3, 2010
1,123
0
0
Devs for BF3 already said a GTX 460 will run the game perfectly.

Yes BUT that doesn't mean I can get 60fps all over the map which is entirely destructible with 64 players and all the eye candy to the max.
I hope it won't run perfectly on a GTX460 otherwise progress will have ground to a halt.
 

96Firebird

Diamond Member
Nov 8, 2010
5,738
334
126
I hope it won't run perfectly on a GTX460 otherwise progress will have ground to a halt.

That makes little sense. If DICE can make a game that looks great and performs on midrange cards, how is that not progress?
 

Jacky60

Golden Member
Jan 3, 2010
1,123
0
0
That makes little sense. If DICE can make a game that looks great and performs on midrange cards, how is that not progress?

Looking great is progress but I want better than great. Increased complexity of scenes, more textures etc at some point exceed peak fill rates of mid range cards. Unless they can work miracles with texture compression or really limit view distance then if it runs perfectly on a 460 then its not pushing the envelope.