whistleclient
Platinum Member
june 27th, i think
-
We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.
Battlefield 2 Official Site. POLL! JUNE 23! JUNE 23! JUNE 23!
Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
june 27th, i think
whistleclient
Platinum Member
nah, too arcade-y. for better gameplay they balance it out so ground troops actually have a chance against armor.
SaintTigurius
Senior member
man this games is going to tighter than a 14 year old.
Concillian
Diamond Member
I have to say no as well.
I played the hell out of BF1942
I bought BFV very shortly after release and it was good, but had some pretty large balance issues, some of which continued for several patch releases over many months. Performance of BFV was horrendous compared to other games that looked better.
Ultimately I like the gameplay style, but the implementation in BFV was poor, and I didn't like what I was seeing in terms of customer support. Now that DICE is now owned by EA, we know that support isn't going to be getting any better.
Result is that BF2 becomes a firm "wait and see"
I played the hell out of BF1942
I bought BFV very shortly after release and it was good, but had some pretty large balance issues, some of which continued for several patch releases over many months. Performance of BFV was horrendous compared to other games that looked better.
Ultimately I like the gameplay style, but the implementation in BFV was poor, and I didn't like what I was seeing in terms of customer support. Now that DICE is now owned by EA, we know that support isn't going to be getting any better.
Result is that BF2 becomes a firm "wait and see"
Concillian
Diamond Member
Oh man, they included the FX 5200. The 5200 was a horrible card for BFV, I can't even imagine how bad it will be for BF2. For those who are not aware, BFV HEAVILY favored ATi. My benchmarks for 9700 Pro and 5900xt are here:
http://home.insightbb.com/~dgramlin/wsb/html/battlefield_vietnam_benchmarks.htm
I suppose if they fixed the performance issues with zooming, BF2 might not perform so bad. But framerates were completely neutered in BFV when you zoomed. Performance in general wasn't horrible, but there were certain situations that would cause performance to nosedive, crash and burn, and that was tremendously annoying.
More info on the zoom issue killing framerates:
http://www.hardocp.com/article.html?art=NjA2LDc=
whistleclient
Platinum Member
as of right now: june 27
tranceport
Diamond Member
Sure does look a lot like desert combat (mod for bf1942)......
Mr. Lennon
Diamond Member
LOL
homercles337
Diamond Member
You should be banned from the forum for spam. You work for EA or something? 😕
whistleclient
Platinum Member
Googer
Lifer
Look at these Clips!
http://www.gamershell.com/download_8530.shtml
http://www.gamershell.com/download_8530.shtml
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 24K
-
-
