Battlefield 1943 (not 42)

[Googer]

Originally posted by: Exterous

Originally posted by: phreaqe
i just read a september release date for pc. boo to that. i will have forgotten about it by then and wont care. i dont like these staggered release dates that seem to be coming more common.

Damnit. Why so many more months for the PC game? Bastards!

That's their base, the very people who gave Battlefield a foundation in the world. And it seems like they are putting us on the back burner. Way to go EA!

 

[Googer]

Originally posted by: masteryoda34
I have the Battlefield Heroes beta. It really disappointed me.

It takes a small amount of Learning, but Empires (Mod) for the Source Engine is BF to the next level. It's free if you own a source powered game (HL2, CS:S, DoD:S, The Ship, etc)

• Custoized Tanks
• Cool Weapons Setups
• Complex Game Play
• Mandatory Teamwork
• Many ways to Victory, many ways to defeat.
• Oh, and it's addicting as heck.

As a bonus, the developers are regular players whom you see often see actively playing the game.

http://www.empiresmod.com/

 

[Googer]

Originally posted by: So

Originally posted by: The Boston Dangler
no. BF2 has earned them permanent "fuck you" status.

That's alright, 2142 was a big "fuck you" right back from them.

And BF:V was just a glorified mod, but it was a damn fun one.

Don't forget the 1942 addon for BFV.

 

[zerocool84]

Originally posted by: slayer202
I don't remember BF2 on PC being that bad. I think it was pretty fun actually. of course its garbage compared to COD4 now though. 2142 was pretty crappy though. 1942 was cool. I hate FPS games on consoles but might buy it instead of waiting months for the pc

You can't even compare BF2 and COD4. Too different to be compared.