• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Battlefield 1 Benchmarks (Gamegpu & the rest)

Page 11 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
krumme said:
Imo its a big disappointment if they need more than a month or two this time to iron out the bugs. Its nearly 3 years ago so they should have learned. As it is i am dissapointed it isnt more clean dx12 game like doom and at least work more polished out the gate with such a giant budget.

Still looks pretty darn cool especially art and surely i will play this stuff instead of this tf2 i am playing now....at least for a while. Lol.
Click to expand...

I strongly believe that if BF1 was DX-12 ONLY it would be perfect now, but because there are lots and lots of people with DX-11 (and those with DX-12 hardware/software can also play in DX-11 mode) they chose to have DX-11 ready for launch time by devoting all the time they had to it and left DX-12 for later.
 
felang said:
Can anybody point me to an article that mentions how the different Video options/levels affect fps/visual quality. I'm running a 290x (1125mhz) and what like to try to optimize vid options in order to maintain close to 60fps @1440p, in other words optimize my config.
Click to expand...

I would start by turning off motion blur, it has a noticeable hit to FPS, and personally I hate the effect. Motion blur is caused by low frame rate on film and does not belong in a game. Next thing I would knock down a notch is shadows. Ultra shadows to High shadows is very little difference, but has a decent sized performance hit.
 
Bacon1 said:
They've updated their results today:

http://www.gamegpu.com/action-/-fps-/-tps/battlefield-1-test-gpu

Looks to basically just have CFX support, don't think they retested anything else (all others appear to match original tests).

1920_11.png


2560_11.png


3840_11.png
Click to expand...

Nice Mgpu scaling. I should get about 90-100fps min based on this info. Bah probably a bit less than that really. Big maps, chaos etc etc.
 
Playing this on ultra settings, 1440p (plus 140% resolution scaling) and even in 64 player servers I don't know if I go lower than 80 fps 😀
 
Annisman* said:
Playing this on ultra settings, 1440p (plus 140% resolution scaling) and even in 64 player servers I don't know if I go lower than 80 fps 😀
Click to expand...

You still rocking that 3930k too? Serious? I thought I was the only one left. I thought I was like the last guy on earth still gaming with that thing. It kicks ass, that's why. Does it bottleneck your Titan X?
 
I hope they include a decent benchmark. Because I can't bother with all these review site results without accompanying benchmark run videos, clock speeds etc.
 
moonbogg said:
You still rocking that 3930k too? Serious? I thought I was the only one left. I thought I was like the last guy on earth still gaming with that thing. It kicks ass, that's why. Does it bottleneck your Titan X?
Click to expand...

Haha loved the 3930k but I upgraded a couple months ago to a 6700k @ 4.7 just haven't updated my sig.
 
krumme said:
Imo its a big disappointment if they need more than a month or two this time to iron out the bugs. Its nearly 3 years ago so they should have learned. As it is i am dissapointed it isnt more clean dx12 game like doom and at least work more polished out the gate with such a giant budget.

Still looks pretty darn cool especially art and surely i will play this stuff instead of this tf2 i am playing now....at least for a while. Lol.
Click to expand...

My opinion still is that developers should release the game without known issues in the first place. But it seems to be the way business is done now that you have to wait 6 months for the truly "finished" version of the game to be available.

Strangely enough, the last game I can remember where it was done on release from a technical standpoint was StarWars Battlefront by the same company. The content wasn't done though, so maybe this is just another symptom of the same disease.
 
Headfoot said:
My opinion still is that developers should release the game without known issues in the first place. But it seems to be the way business is done now that you have to wait 6 months for the truly "finished" version of the game to be available.

Strangely enough, the last game I can remember where it was done on release from a technical standpoint was StarWars Battlefront by the same company. The content wasn't done though, so maybe this is just another symptom of the same disease.
Click to expand...
Yes. One can also say we should just wait.
The problem is though if we choose to enter bf1 just 2 month late when most bugs is ironed out and the first package is there and content is set all the rest of the guys in the game will just flat out beat you to deat. Literally. Its not fun. All the open beta testing need to stop for the same reason. It takes away the magic.
I think for those reasons it would be better to wait as you say.

Now i am on the business side and know how expensive it is to wait. Unfortunately its a problem not only from software but to other products as well eg cars. Product development is getting more and more complex. Especially software but the time we have for development goes down.

Part of the problem of late/timely release of products seems to be not only wasted revenue and cash flow but also compettitors releasing before you.

If someone knows management tricks how to obercome the dilemmas in TTM and bug free software pls let me know 🙂
 
krumme said:
Yes. One can also say we should just wait.
The problem is though if we choose to enter bf1 just 2 month late when most bugs is ironed out and the first package is there and content is set all the rest of the guys in the game will just flat out beat you to deat. Literally. Its not fun. All the open beta testing need to stop for the same reason. It takes away the magic.
I think for those reasons it would be better to wait as you say.

Now i am on the business side and know how expensive it is to wait. Unfortunately its a problem not only from software but to other products as well eg cars. Product development is getting more and more complex. Especially software but the time we have for development goes down.

Part of the problem of late/timely release of products seems to be not only wasted revenue and cash flow but also compettitors releasing before you.

If someone knows management tricks how to obercome the dilemmas in TTM and bug free software pls let me know 🙂
Click to expand...
Totally agree. For titles like this, if it doesn't work well out of the gate I wont buy it ever because everyone will be leveled up and good at the game, so I'll just get stomped and have no fun. I won't be buying BF1 anyways because I literally didnt enjoy a single moment of the beta. It felt stale right off the bat. Like a mix of the simple gameplay of SWBF meets the vestige that battlefield has become. Yet another "realistic" shooter where all people do is constantly snipe which is absolute no fun at all.

That's why the only shooter i've bought and enjoyed in recent memory has been Overwatch, and before that TF2. I loved BF1942, BF2, BF2142 and BFBC2. Played a ton of those. But it's gotten really stale since then.
 
I noticed this in the bf1 review.

Conclusion
Well there you have it, Battlefield 1 is an awesome looking game that is very well optimised. The only headache we encountered was the account limitation which locks you out for 24 hours after five hardware changes, that made testing a pain and rather expensive as three copies of the game were required.

That sucks 🙁
 
Annisman* said:
Haha loved the 3930k but I upgraded a couple months ago to a 6700k @ 4.7 just haven't updated my sig.
Click to expand...

Ah crap. I guess I am alone. Skylake-E and KabyX can't come soon enough. I am just about ready to snatch up something new and I still have quite a long wait here.
 
I wish review sites would benchmark a older processor like the i5 2500k and tell us what results they get with a GTX 1070 and GTX 1080 on BF1 on a 64 slot multiplayer server!

That or someone here had a i5 2500k and a GTX 1070 or GTX 1080 and could tell me what their minimum fps is on a 64 slot multiplayer server ?
 
Unreal123 said:
Next time please post some proper details as well. They used 2 months old driver for Nvidia and they used 15 days old driver of AMD.
Click to expand...

More importantly though, neither the Nvidia drivers nor the AMD drivers used were game ready for BF1 (although the Nvidia drivers used are listed as game ready for the BF1 beta).

375.57 and 16.10.2 are the game ready drivers from Nvidia and AMD respectively.
 
antihelten said:
More importantly though, neither the Nvidia drivers nor the AMD drivers used were game ready for BF1 (although the Nvidia drivers used are listed as game ready for the BF1 beta).

375.57 and 16.10.2 are the game ready drivers from Nvidia and AMD respectively.
Click to expand...

AMD released a BF1 beta driver a couple months ago (16.8.3). Technically speaking it's a fair comparison in terms of the first effort driver during a beta. Obviously, the final drivers and launch version of the game is going to give a more accurate assessment.
 
Despoiler said:
AMD released a BF1 beta driver a couple months ago (16.8.3). Technically speaking it's a fair comparison in terms of the first effort driver during a beta. Obviously, the final drivers and launch version of the game is going to give a more accurate assessment.
Click to expand...

Cool, I honestly didn't know AMD had a driver with beta support (the only reason I noticed it with the Nvidia driver was because the exact driver used by tweaktown was also the one that first brought beta support).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top