Originally posted by: pray4mojo
its definately 96m/s
Originally posted by: krnxpride83
masteringphysics.com?
Originally posted by: pray4mojo
Originally posted by: krnxpride83
masteringphysics.com?
I use that.
Originally posted by: hypn0tik
Originally posted by: Compnewbie01
Would that mean that the initial velocity (Vo) is 6 m/s and that it would be going 36 m/s at t = 6 seconds? Since it was 16 m/s at t = 2 seconds, it accelerated 10 m/s during that time.
That's exactly what I got.
V = Vo + at
Sub in the point you know:
16 = Vo + 5 (2)
Vo = 6.
Sub in second point:
V = 6 + 5 (6) = 36m/s.
Alternate solution:
a(t) = 5
Integrate to find v(t)
v(t) = 5t + c
v(2) = 16 --> c = 6
v(6) = 5(6) + 6 = 36m/s.
Originally posted by: jchu14
Originally posted by: PottedMeat
Heh is this the UT Physics Homework Service?
haha i was thinking that the whole time. I know UTHW all too well.
LONGHORNS REPRESENT! Aerospace Engineering c/o '08 (hopefully!) =)
Originally posted by: Wnh5001
here is another problem not worth anything though, do it if u are bored and need to refresh your physics lol...>_>
"A drowsy cat spots a flowerpot that sails first up and then down past an open window. The pot was in view for a total of 0.45 s, and the top-to-bottom height of the window is 2.50 m. How high above the window top did the flowerpot go?"
i already tried to answer it and used up my five total tries. my setup looked like 2.5=.225v-1/2(9.8m/s^2)(.225)^2 and solved for v, inputted back into some equation to find that displacment above the window = 4.09 m but it seems it was wrong, meh, maybe wrong sig figs.. >_<
Originally posted by: jchu14
Originally posted by: PottedMeat
Heh is this the UT Physics Homework Service?
haha i was thinking that the whole time. I know UTHW all too well.
LONGHORNS REPRESENT! Aerospace Engineering c/o '08 (hopefully!) =)
Originally posted by: Cybore
Can someone post how to solve the problems using the equations posted:
V=Vo + at
X-Xo = Vot + 1/2at^2
v^2=Vo^2 + 2a(X-Xo)
X-Xo=1/2(Vo+v)t
X-Xo=vt-1/2at^2
took physics last year but already forgot how to solve this. jchu14's solution seems kinda hard to comprehend since apparently uses calculus.
Originally posted by: KillerCharlie
I'm aerospace too... here's one equation (inequality) I'm sure you've learned by now:
Aerospace Engineering > *
🙂
Originally posted by: SaturnX
Originally posted by: Wnh5001
here is another problem not worth anything though, do it if u are bored and need to refresh your physics lol...>_>
"A drowsy cat spots a flowerpot that sails first up and then down past an open window. The pot was in view for a total of 0.45 s, and the top-to-bottom height of the window is 2.50 m. How high above the window top did the flowerpot go?"
i already tried to answer it and used up my five total tries. my setup looked like 2.5=.225v-1/2(9.8m/s^2)(.225)^2 and solved for v, inputted back into some equation to find that displacment above the window = 4.09 m but it seems it was wrong, meh, maybe wrong sig figs.. >_<
Here's this solution:
You set up the initial equation:
2.5 = 0.225Vo - (0.5)*(-9.8)*(0.225)^2
Solve for v
you should get:
Vo = 10.00
Now using the equation:
v^2=Vo^2 + 2a(Y-Yo)
you know at that at the highest point, V = 0, but a = -g, and Y-Yo = Ymax
Ymax = (Vo)^2 / 2g
So Ymax = 5.10
Distance travelled ABOVE the windows = 5.10 - 2.50 = 2.60m
Now this is taking the base of the window as being 0 m
The trick in the question, as you seen to understand, that the time given is for both up and down travel, so you only use half for one direction.
The next trick is using the correct sign for the accelerations due to gravity. When an object is travelling upwards it experiences -9.8m/s^s, NOT postive accel.
--Mark