Such a petpeeve of mine. I was explaining this concept to a friend and he didnt get it. Then I told him I have almost 130K miles still on the factory showroom brakes and that was his proof the concept works.
I also dont get people who need to pedal to metal accelerate and get to a red light only to slam n the brakes. Meanwhile Im cruising/coasting to a red light only to have it turn green as Im getting there. Whose car do you think will burn less fuel and be subject to less wear and tear? Had a lady in a minivan flip out, wave her hands wildly and lay on the horn because Im coasting towards a red light.

Some people really need some sense to be slapped into them.
I do it sometimes so that I can get to the loop sensor in the road before the light starts to cycle, thus ensuring that the system will activate the left turn light.
But I do see the people who'll ride someone's bumper on the highway, with the brake lights coming on every few seconds.
if there is a red light ahead there is no reason to speed up to the light. I just let the car coast and the guy next to me who speeds up to the light triggers it.
If you just coast from way back by the time he triggers the light you don't waste your gas/brakes etc and you still have momentum and you cruise on. Most of the gas is wasted on trying to get that 2 ton car moving so the less you come to a complete stop the better.
Sometimes I'll look ahead and see someone in the lane, but once I get there, I find that they've parked with the back end of their car
past the heavy white "Stop here, dammit" line, so they're past the loop sensor, and the light doesn't trigger.
Corollary: When someone stops >1 car length in front of the white line, and the light's sensor doesn't register anything at all, and it's a single lane so there's no way around, and there's no proper way to indicate to another driver "Please move ahead by 15 feet," and so the light takes a
very long time to reach a secondary timeout and cycle through.
That actually happened to me once on a COLA bump.
It was just enough to take me out of the high end of one bracket into the low end of the next bracket. I think it was only about a $40 loss for the year, but a loss is a loss.
I am prime example! I got $2,000 raise. LAst year my ta return both federal and state combined was a lil over $1,700 This year because of the raise I just got back $400 from federal and 200 from state.
Maybe the withholding amount changed automatically.
You'd have to look at the actual net amount you ended up paying.
If you front them $5k and get back $2k, but next year you end up fronting them $6k and get back $2.5k, you're still paying more in taxes. You just gave them way too much money, so there's more left to refund.
Tax bracket example:
$0-10000: 10%
$10001 - $20000: 20%
$20001 - ∞: 30%
Make $9999: Your tax burden is 10%. $999.90 tax bill.
Make $10000: Your tax burden is 10%. $1000.00 tax bill.
Make $10001: Your tax burden is 10% on the first $10000 and 20% on the remaining dollar. $1000.20 tax bill. Overall rate: ~10.001%
Make $20001: Your tax burden is 10% on the first $10000, 20% on the next $10000, and 30% on the remaining dollar. $3000.30. Overall rate: ~15.001%.
are we really having the plane on a treadmill discussion AGAIN?
Some people here might not have been born when that thread happened. :awe:
I thought the best argument was the one that assumed the treadmill would be matching the speed of the wheels themselves. As the plane moves forward it adds to the speed of the wheels, which the treadmill then matches, which adds to the speed of the wheels, and so on. The treadmill quickly spins up to infinity mph, the wheels melt off, and the treadmill tears the plane to pieces. I don't know if it would really work that way, but it's the one I like to imagine the most.
If they at least approach light speed, the resulting energy release would be enough to lift the plane's vaporized remnants skyward.