Originally posted by: jonnyGURU
<EDIT> Scratch that.... The CPU doesn't work w/ a 166 MHz FSB.![]()
I'll just slow the Barton down and see what happens.
Chiz
Originally posted by: jonnyGURU
<EDIT> Scratch that.... The CPU doesn't work w/ a 166 MHz FSB.![]()
I'll just slow the Barton down and see what happens.
Originally posted by: Soulkeeper
from that benchmark it looks like the added cache equals about 150-250mhz in performance
but i don't trust the benchmark
Originally posted by: classy
Originally posted by: Soulkeeper
from that benchmark it looks like the added cache equals about 150-250mhz in performance
but i don't trust the benchmark
Exactly. It is running at almost 200 mhz less than the 2400+. Thats one. Two, you can believe that the bios is not perfected for the 512k cache either. And three if his machine was running messed up how can anyone trust any of the benchmarks?