• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Baldwin to run as Republican for Lt. Governor in Montana

Status
Not open for further replies.
A

Anarchist420

Diamond Member
http://radiofreeredoubt.blogspot.com/2011/11/chuck-baldwin-announces-run-for-montana.html

I hope he wins (it's going to be a crowded field, however) because he would lead the States in nullifying Federal legislation. Maybe this means that Ron Paul has backup plans to take his place as Constitutional Party nominee (don't quote me on that though) since the Libertarian Party is no longer libertarian (Gary Johnson is rumored to be seeking its nomination).
 
Radio Free Redoubt: Voice of the AMERICAN REDOUBT -- The Emerging Safe Haven and Refuge for God-Fearing, Liberty-Loving Patriots of the Western United States.

God lord, the sewers of the internet that you go to.
 
I don't know anything about this guy, but the fact that Anarchist420 supports him means he must be a moron.
 
ichy said:
I don't know anything about this guy, but the fact that Anarchist420 supports him means he must be a moron.
Click to expand...
No, I'm probably his only supporter that people deem to be retarded. Just because Ron Paul is supported by some neonazis doesn't mean that Ron Paul is a neonazi himself.

And no, I'm not a neonazi.
 
I should know better than to even ask this, but how is the Lt Governor of a relatively tiny (in terms of population and economic output) state going to "lead the States in nullifying Federal legislation"?
 
Don Vito Corleone said:
The states cannot "nullify Federal legislation." Show me what they actually did with a cite to something other than a crackpot website and/or blog.
Click to expand...
That may be true because of the supramacy clause.

However, he could be helpful in the start of a secession movement. He's as good as anyone at exposing Federal tyranny.
 
Anarchist420 said:
Because they've already nullified Federal gun legislation.
Click to expand...


no. they haven't

The "Montana Firearms Freedom Act" is unconstitutional. Just because it's on the books, doesn't make it enforcable. In fact, if they tried to enforce it, which they haven't... it would be instantly struck down as unconstitutional.

In fact.. it's currently making it's way thru the court system right now.


It was signed in to law by Governor Brian Schweitzer on April 15, 2009 and became effective on October 1, 2009.

On July 16, 2009, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives published an open letter to Montana Federal Firearms Licensees, clarifying the bureau's position on the Montana Firearms Freedom Act.

According to this letter, "...because the Act conflicts with Federal firearms laws and regulations, Federal law supersedes the Act, and all provisions of the Gun Control Act and the National Firearms Act, and their corresponding regulations, continue to apply."



 
Anarchist420 said:
http://radiofreeredoubt.blogspot.com/2011/11/chuck-baldwin-announces-run-for-montana.html

I hope he wins (it's going to be a crowded field, however) because he would lead the States in nullifying Federal legislation. Maybe this means that Ron Paul has backup plans to take his place as Constitutional Party nominee (don't quote me on that though) since the Libertarian Party is no longer libertarian (Gary Johnson is rumored to be seeking its nomination).
Click to expand...


I just find it really ironic that you are supporting a constitutionalism candidate.

Ultimately it won't matter unless 15 people decide to cast a vote that way for the hell of it and it ends up being the majority. The rest of the nation won't give a parting glance as it will mean nothing.
 
Anarchist420 said:
That may be true because of the supramacy clause.

However, he could be helpful in the start of a secession movement. He's as good as anyone at exposing Federal tyranny.
Click to expand...

So you'd be cool w/ Montana getting rid of the 1st amendment to the constitution as well? That'd be just as unenforceable, as well as stupid, but at least it'd help expose that tyranny in Washington, right?
 
Slick5150 said:
So you'd be cool w/ Montana getting rid of the 1st amendment to the constitution as well? That'd be just as unenforceable, as well as stupid, but at least it'd help expose that tyranny in Washington, right?
Click to expand...
The 1st amendment didn't apply to the States. I agree that limiting free speech is stupid (the State I live in sucks in regards to free speech, I know), but I don't want the Federal government sending in tanks to enforce rights.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top