Bailout Bank Blows Millions Partying in L.A.

Modelworks

Lifer
Feb 22, 2007
16,240
7
76
We all knew it was going to happen, or was happening, now there is proof. And they wonder why people hate banks. Can anything be done , prosecution wise to the bank ? Or do we just have to keep bending over for crap like this ?

Pictures at site.

http://www.tmz.com/2009/02/24/...rn-trust-bank-bailout/
A bank that received $1.6 billion in bailout money just spent a fortune last week in L.A. hosting a series of lavish parties and concerts with famous singers ... and TMZ cameras caught it all.


Northern Trust, a Chicago-based bank, sponsored the Northern Trust Open at the Riviera Country Club in L.A. We're told Northern Trust paid millions to sponsor the PGA event which ended Sunday, but what happened off the golf course is even more shocking.

Northern Trust flew hundreds of clients and employees to L.A. and put many of them up at some of the fanciest and priciest hotels in the city. We're told more than a hundred people were put up at the Beverly Wilshire in Bev Hills, and another hundred stayed at the Loews Santa Monica Beach Hotel. Still more stayed at the Ritz Carlton in Marina Del Rey and others at Casa Del Mar in Santa Monica.

- Wednesday, Northern Trust hosted a fancy dinner at the Ritz followed by a performance by the group Chicago.

- Thursday, Northern Trust rented a private hangar at the Santa Monica Airport for dinner, followed by a performance by Earth, Wind & Fire.

- Saturday, Northern Trust had the entire House of Blues in West Hollywood shut down for its private party. We got the menu -- guests dined on seared salmon and petite Angus filet. Dinner was followed by a performance by none other than Sheryl Crow.

There was also a fabulous cocktail party at the Loews. And how's this for a nice touch: Female guests at the Chicago concert all got trinkets from ... TIFFANY AND CO.

s for what all that costs: Well, the company isn't talking. We spoke with a rep from the band Chicago who said Northern Trust paid them around $100,000. A House of Blues source told us it cost more than $50,000 to close the joint down last Saturday night. As for Sheryl Crow's fee, her rep didn't get back to us. Earth, Wind & Fire acknowledges payment but won't say how much.

As for the golf tournament, a rep from the PGA told us Northern Trust wrote one big fat check in order to sponsor the event. That check covers part of the $6.3 million purse, the advertising costs for the spots on CBS (which broadcast the final two rounds of the tournament) and operating costs. The rep says the fee was negotiated and is confidential.

Lots of people from Northern Trust went to the golf tourney ... in special Mercedes that shuttled them to and from the hotels. But for those who weren't into golfing, they could spend a few hours at the Northern Trust seminar on the credit crunch.

Now how's this for outrage? Northern Trust laid off 450 workers in December, 4% of its workforce.

And here's what's absolutely amazing: The United States Government flat out gave Northern Trust the $1.6 billion in bailout money, and the bank didn't even request it!

Northern Trust gave us a statement yesterday before going total radio silence. A rep for the bank acknowledges they paid for the events, but that the bailout money did not pay for the events. He claims it was paid out of the bank's operating expenses. Here's Northern Trust's full statement to us.

Perhaps we're missing something, but money is money. How can they spend like this when they're using taxpayer's money, whether they asked for it or not? And where the hell is Congress in all of this? Is there any oversight or accountability?

Your tax dollars, hard at work. Thomas Jefferson was right -- "A little rebellion, now and then, is a good thing."
 

JS80

Lifer
Oct 24, 2005
26,271
7
81
Banks aren't allowed to sponsor events anymore? That Ritz in the marina isn't that special, I've stayed there.
 

Modelworks

Lifer
Feb 22, 2007
16,240
7
76
Originally posted by: JS80
Banks aren't allowed to sponsor events anymore? That Ritz in the marina isn't that special, I've stayed there.

They can sponsor all they like, but not when they take taxpayer money.
They spent millions, took 1.6 billion from taxpayers and laid off 450 people .
 

Skitzer

Diamond Member
Mar 20, 2000
4,414
3
81
Doesn't appear they were trying to hide anything.
Transparency is wonderful isn't it?
What is there we can do about it .................... NOTHING!
 

shiner

Lifer
Jul 18, 2000
17,112
1
0
Sounds like the Board and management of Northern Trust needs to be rounded up and put in prison for theft.
 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
You guys are not getting it, this is retention money, otherwise the employees will go elsewhere, hee hee
 

jpeyton

Moderator in SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones
Moderator
Aug 23, 2003
25,375
142
116
Sweet. I can't wait to see how you guys micromanage every dollar of the bailout money.
 

JS80

Lifer
Oct 24, 2005
26,271
7
81
Originally posted by: Modelworks
Originally posted by: JS80
Banks aren't allowed to sponsor events anymore? That Ritz in the marina isn't that special, I've stayed there.

They can sponsor all they like, but not when they take taxpayer money.
They spent millions, took 1.6 billion from taxpayers and laid off 450 people .

So they can't spend money on advertising? And then they lose market share and are in even a deeper hole?
 

The-Noid

Diamond Member
Nov 16, 2005
3,117
4
76
Good deal, they can use the TARP money to keep making money because as of yet they have not lost money. Accordingly my guess is they know better than you how to run their money.

They run Custodian services. My guess is their AUM is down and this is unfortunately how you get high net worth individuals to use your custodian services.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
52,368
45,797
136
NT is a very conservative bank for the wealthy, they never were in any trouble. The gov basically shoved the TARP money at them and just they didn't turn it down.

Nothing to see here.
 

Modelworks

Lifer
Feb 22, 2007
16,240
7
76
Originally posted by: K1052
NT is a very conservative bank for the wealthy, they never were in any trouble. The gov basically shoved the TARP money at them and just they didn't turn it down.

Nothing to see here.

And that redeems them how ?
 

yllus

Elite Member & Lifer
Aug 20, 2000
20,577
432
126
Originally posted by: Modelworks
Originally posted by: K1052
NT is a very conservative bank for the wealthy, they never were in any trouble. The gov basically shoved the TARP money at them and just they didn't turn it down.

Nothing to see here.

And that redeems them how ?

According to Fortune Magazine the feds pressured a number of solvent banks to take TARP funds in order to avoid stigma. I don't really get how that works but there it is anyways.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
52,368
45,797
136
Originally posted by: Modelworks
Originally posted by: K1052
NT is a very conservative bank for the wealthy, they never were in any trouble. The gov basically shoved the TARP money at them and just they didn't turn it down.

Nothing to see here.

And that redeems them how ?

Redeems them for what?

The government is going to make money on this as the bank is basically certain to repay in full under the terms agreed and enable the bank to make even more sound investments which will further stimulate the economy.

It should be noted also that NT entered the 5 year sponsorship with the PGA a year ago. Breaking the contract would probably cost them more than fulfilling their agreement.
 

Modelworks

Lifer
Feb 22, 2007
16,240
7
76
Originally posted by: yllus
Originally posted by: Modelworks
Originally posted by: K1052
NT is a very conservative bank for the wealthy, they never were in any trouble. The gov basically shoved the TARP money at them and just they didn't turn it down.

Nothing to see here.

And that redeems them how ?

According to Fortune Magazine the feds pressured a number of solvent banks to take TARP funds in order to avoid stigma. I don't really get how that works but there it is anyways.

damn, so we have stigma now for not getting TARP funds ? One big club I guess. Gotten your share ? NO , well come on in and join the club !
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,398
8,568
126
Originally posted by: yllus
Originally posted by: Modelworks
Originally posted by: K1052
NT is a very conservative bank for the wealthy, they never were in any trouble. The gov basically shoved the TARP money at them and just they didn't turn it down.

Nothing to see here.

And that redeems them how ?

According to Fortune Magazine the feds pressured a number of solvent banks to take TARP funds in order to avoid stigma. I don't really get how that works but there it is anyways.

it was to prevent runs on banks that took it vs banks that didn't. dunno how well that's worked out.
 

Modelworks

Lifer
Feb 22, 2007
16,240
7
76
Originally posted by: K1052
Originally posted by: Modelworks
Originally posted by: K1052
NT is a very conservative bank for the wealthy, they never were in any trouble. The gov basically shoved the TARP money at them and just they didn't turn it down.

Nothing to see here.

And that redeems them how ?

Redeems them for what?

The government is going to make money on this as the bank is basically certain to repay in full under the terms agreed and enable the bank to make even more sound investments which will further stimulate the economy.

It should be noted also that NT entered the 5 year sponsorship with the PGA a year ago. Breaking the contract would probably cost them more than fulfilling their agreement.

Yeah, they sure stimulated the economy for the PGA, the hotels and Sheryl Crow. Too bad the 450 workers they laid off didn't see any of it.

 

chess9

Elite member
Apr 15, 2000
7,748
0
0
Originally posted by: JS80
Banks aren't allowed to sponsor events anymore? That Ritz in the marina isn't that special, I've stayed there.

Are you practicing being brain dead, or have you already donated that pea to someone's salad?

This was little more than thievery of the taxpayer's money.

Line 'em up and shoot 'em.

-Robert

 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
52,368
45,797
136
Originally posted by: Modelworks
Originally posted by: K1052
Originally posted by: Modelworks
Originally posted by: K1052
NT is a very conservative bank for the wealthy, they never were in any trouble. The gov basically shoved the TARP money at them and just they didn't turn it down.

Nothing to see here.

And that redeems them how ?

Redeems them for what?

The government is going to make money on this as the bank is basically certain to repay in full under the terms agreed and enable the bank to make even more sound investments which will further stimulate the economy.

It should be noted also that NT entered the 5 year sponsorship with the PGA a year ago. Breaking the contract would probably cost them more than fulfilling their agreement.

Yeah, they sure stimulated the economy for the PGA, the hotels and Sheryl Crow. Too bad the 450 workers they laid off didn't see any of it.

How they staff their profitable bank is their concern.
 

The-Noid

Diamond Member
Nov 16, 2005
3,117
4
76
Contract was for 5 years at the pga tour event. If they got out they still lost the money as undiscounted cash flows over the next 4 years.

They'd might as well use the exposure to gain clients.

also even the biased articles talks about them being FORCED to take the money. THIS IS A PROFITABLE BANK THAT DID NOT NEED THEY MONEY!
 

Modelworks

Lifer
Feb 22, 2007
16,240
7
76
Originally posted by: K1052
Originally posted by: Modelworks
Originally posted by: K1052
Originally posted by: Modelworks
Originally posted by: K1052
NT is a very conservative bank for the wealthy, they never were in any trouble. The gov basically shoved the TARP money at them and just they didn't turn it down.

Nothing to see here.

And that redeems them how ?

Redeems them for what?

The government is going to make money on this as the bank is basically certain to repay in full under the terms agreed and enable the bank to make even more sound investments which will further stimulate the economy.

It should be noted also that NT entered the 5 year sponsorship with the PGA a year ago. Breaking the contract would probably cost them more than fulfilling their agreement.

Yeah, they sure stimulated the economy for the PGA, the hotels and Sheryl Crow. Too bad the 450 workers they laid off didn't see any of it.

How they staff their profitable bank is their concern.

Then they can give back the $1.6 billion , they obviously don't need it.
And hire back the 450 employees they laid off.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
52,368
45,797
136
Originally posted by: Modelworks
Then they can give back the $1.6 billion , they obviously don't need it.
And hire back the 450 employees they laid off.

Why don't you save your whining for the government which loaned a very solvent bank a billion and a half dollars.
 

The-Noid

Diamond Member
Nov 16, 2005
3,117
4
76
They already have asked to pay the money back. Congress is still writing the clause to let them pay it back.

I also don't think they majority of the people in this thread understand what a custodian bank or trust company is.