Now that you're all making a fuss while we beat around the bush of the larger issue, I'd like to address that:
Nuclear proliferation. At what point do you draw a Red Line?
Many of you folks seem perfectly happy with a nuclear Iran. Who's next? Eventually you whittle it down to every single nation. Of course not every nation is stable. There are revolutions, civil wars, separatists. Splinters of nations. If the south rises again, would you be happy with a nuclear Alabama? Then perhaps some corporations and private individuals. Should some rich folks have uranium enrichment? How about me?
There comes a point where you say no. Where you will authorize the use of force. If fanatical religious zealots don't do it for you, then what does?
I don't think a discussion on how far Iran should go is warranted if you're simply drawing the line much further down the road. Our disagreement will not yield common ground.