Bad Boys II wins my award for.....

theNEOone

Diamond Member
Apr 22, 2001
5,745
4
81
....most unrealistic movie of 2003. still fun to watch though.

speaking of unrealistic, i was thinking about which are the most misrepresented professions in hollywood. right now i'm thinking police officers....any ideas?




=|
 

AzNmAnJLH

Golden Member
Feb 26, 2002
1,785
1
0
yeah that part where they choose h2 instead of h1 to destroy the town... that is totally unrealistic
 

MikeMike

Lifer
Feb 6, 2000
45,885
66
91
except every stunt was actually done, none, if any cgi in the movie!! in todays tech age, thats unheard of.

MIKE
 

RIGorous1

Platinum Member
Oct 26, 2002
2,053
0
71
did any of you guys hear about the 30 million dollar house that they blew up in that movie just for the shot? Stupid in my opinion, as they could've just used a skeletal prop.
 

kb315

Senior member
Jun 16, 2001
394
0
0
Originally posted by: theNEOone
....most unrealistic movie of 2003. still fun to watch though.

speaking of unrealistic, i was thinking about which are the most misrepresented professions in hollywood. right now i'm thinking police officers....any ideas?




=|

Apparently u have not seen @ss$hit movie called Charlie's Angels Full Throtle.
 

kb315

Senior member
Jun 16, 2001
394
0
0
Originally posted by: RIGorous1
did any of you guys hear about the 30 million dollar house that they blew up in that movie just for the shot? Stupid in my opinion.

The owner of the house was gonna have it demolished anyway so they decided to do it for the film.
 

Pr0Hawk

Platinum Member
Feb 12, 2001
2,607
0
0
Originally posted by: kb315
Originally posted by: RIGorous1
did any of you guys hear about the 30 million dollar house that they blew up in that movie just for the shot? Stupid in my opinion.

The owner of the house was gonna have it demolished anyway so they decided to do it for the film.

WHY WOULD HE WANT TO DO THAT?! It was a friggin nice house! Give it to me! :D
 

kb315

Senior member
Jun 16, 2001
394
0
0
Originally posted by: Pr0Hawk
Originally posted by: kb315
Originally posted by: RIGorous1
did any of you guys hear about the 30 million dollar house that they blew up in that movie just for the shot? Stupid in my opinion.

The owner of the house was gonna have it demolished anyway so they decided to do it for the film.

WHY WOULD HE WANT TO DO THAT?! It was a friggin nice house! Give it to me! :D

The owner started to build the house and sometime during construction, he sold all of it to someone else. The other guy just decided to destroy it and build something else. The house wasn't anywhere near being finished, they must of added some stuff to it.
 

RIGorous1

Platinum Member
Oct 26, 2002
2,053
0
71
Oh... thanks for the clarification. I thought it was stupid hollywood looking to overspend their budget .... again. :)
 

theNEOone

Diamond Member
Apr 22, 2001
5,745
4
81
Originally posted by: kb315
Originally posted by: theNEOone
....most unrealistic movie of 2003. still fun to watch though.

speaking of unrealistic, i was thinking about which are the most misrepresented professions in hollywood. right now i'm thinking police officers....any ideas?




=|

Apparently u have not seen @ss$hit movie called Charlie's Angels Full Throtle.

oh god, yes you're right. it was so horribly traumatic though that i developed a split personality where one of me never saw the movie. ahhhhhhhhhhh, you've caused my other side to emerge!!!!!!!! help!!!!!!!!!!



=|
 

focusyn

Senior member
Sep 3, 2000
475
1
0
bad boys 2 had a better storyline, action, and dialogue than matrix reloaded. but that's just my opinion =P
 

halik

Lifer
Oct 10, 2000
25,696
1
81
Originally posted by: kb315
Originally posted by: theNEOone
....most unrealistic movie of 2003. still fun to watch though.

speaking of unrealistic, i was thinking about which are the most misrepresented professions in hollywood. right now i'm thinking police officers....any ideas?




=|

Apparently u have not seen @ss$hit movie called Charlie's Angels Full Throtle.

or that league of x gentlemen
 

Sephy

Platinum Member
Dec 21, 1999
2,035
0
0
Seriously though, Charlies Angels was way more unrealistic. Bad Boys 2 ruled though.
 

Chumpman

Banned
Feb 26, 2003
1,389
0
0
Originally posted by: Sephy
Seriously though, Charlies Angels was way more unrealistic. Bad Boys 2 ruled though.

Certainly you can jump off a dam, and on the way down catch, and start, a helicopter. You can, can't you?!
 

theNEOone

Diamond Member
Apr 22, 2001
5,745
4
81
Originally posted by: focusyn
bad boys 2 had a better storyline, action, and dialogue than matrix reloaded. but that's just my opinion =P

two totally different movies, you can't compare the two.




=|
 

RayH

Senior member
Jun 30, 2000
963
1
81
What do you expect from Michael Bay? This is the same guy who brought you Armageddon and The Rock.
 

brunswickite

Diamond Member
Jul 23, 2002
6,386
1
0
Originally posted by: RayH
What do you expect from Michael Bay? This is the same guy who brought you Armageddon and The Rock.

and pearl harbor
rolleye.gif
 

Regs

Lifer
Aug 9, 2002
16,666
21
81
Yes Mr.Bay never had a good script to work with. Likely because he does such a good job masking over a bad script.

Don't get me wrong, I loved Bad Boys 2. You just have to be a certain type of hardened person to watch it. Some people thought it was just tasteless non-stop senseless action. However some people, like me, love that type of movie! And the comedy between Smith and Lawrence helped big time smoothing out the over the top scenes.