Bachmann can really move in heels, especially if there's a reporter fact checking

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Jan 25, 2011
17,061
9,531
146
Bill O'reilly was in the right for calling out bachmann. bachmann was right that obama leads a lavish lifestyle but she didn't back it up or offer any evidence of this and dodged the question which is why O'reilly called her out.

Now that reporter who went after her only did it because bachmann called out obama. If a democrat falsely called out a republican would the reporter do the same? No because she is an obama supporter.

Wrong again. Are your issues with reading/listening or comprehension? Bachmann offered several specific itemized examples of this supposed lifestyle, all of it was bullshit. Made up. False. Demonstrably so.

Both O'Reilly AND Bash called her out because both demonstrated her claims were bullshit. O'Reilly said nothing about her not supporting her claims. He said she was dead wrong and that she employing trivial attacks which were obscuring any valid criticisms.

You really just can't address something factually can you? Both attacked her for lying. Both. There is no ambiguity here. Yet somehow you see O'Reilly as being in the right and Bash in the wrong for doing the exact sme thing.

The icing on the cake is Bachmann throwing out Benghazi asking why the reporter is bringing up such trivial things when four Americans died. It was Bachmann alone who brought it up. It was her speech and her words.
 
Last edited: