• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Baby OK after being sent through LAX X-ray machine

NFS4

No Lifer
Good thing that the kid is OK because...

:laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh:

Could you imagine the look on the security screener's face seeing the outline of a baby on the screen? 😀

http://blogs.usatoday.com/sky/2006/12/xray.html
A passenger surprised screeners at Los Angeles International Airport after she sent her month-old grandson through the X-ray machine in a plastic bin intended for fliers' personal belongings. In an event the Los Angeles Times (free registration) calls "bizarre but not unprecedented," the baby was first noticed by a screener who caught the child's outline on the X-ray machine and immediately pulled the bin backwards out of the x-ray machine. The baby was taken to a local hospital, where doctors determined the infant's exposure to radiation from the X-ray machine did not hit dangerous levels.

The unidentified 56-year-old woman who sent the baby through the machine apparently did not understand English, something that may have contributed to the mix-up, according to the Times. The paper adds that "the rare incident drew attention to whether officials are staffing often-busy security checkpoints enough to prevent such an accident." The Times cites TSA spokesman Nico Melendez in writing that "the agency doesn't have enough workers to constantly stand at tables in front of the screeners to coach passengers on what should or should not be sent through X-ray machines."
 
Originally posted by: ElFenix
what happened to the screener who usually stands in front of the x-ray machine?

Read:

The Times cites TSA spokesman Nico Melendez in writing that "the agency doesn't have enough workers to constantly stand at tables in front of the screeners to coach passengers on what should or should not be sent through X-ray machines.
 
I don't go to China because I can only read English. You know, don't want to put my kid in an incinerator...or an airport X-Ray machine.

Seriously, retarded parent?
 
Originally posted by: Icanoutsmokeany1
I don't go to China because I can only read English. You know, don't want to put my kid in an incinerator...or an airport X-Ray machine.

Seriously, retarded parent?

No kidding. You don't have to speak english to know not to stick your kid in an x-ray machine.
 
Originally posted by: slayer202
56 year old grandparent. enough said?

I don't get it 😕

My mom and dad are 56. I'm 26. It's feasible that I could have had a few kids by now.
 
The paper adds that "the rare incident drew attention to whether officials are staffing often-busy security checkpoints enough to prevent such an accident."

I think it draws attention to the fact that some people are stupid. Even if they didn't know what the machine was for did they see any other people going through it? No, so why put your baby through it?
 
Yeah, the kid will be alright until he is 30 years old at which point he will die mysteriously from some rare form of cancer. What a screwup.
 
Originally posted by: zephyrprime
Yeah, the kid will be alright until he is 30 years old at which point he will die mysteriously from some rare form of cancer. What a screwup.

:roll:
 
Originally posted by: zephyrprime
Yeah, the kid will be alright until he is 30 years old at which point he will die mysteriously from some rare form of cancer. What a screwup.
Airport X-Ray machines barely have any power. It's less radiation than the kid would get if he broke a bone. I mean, the machines at the airport won't even fog 1600 speed photographic film.

ZV
 
Originally posted by: HeroOfPellinor
She'll probably sue because they didn't have any screeners who spoke her lanugage......and win.

I didn't know that they hired screeners who speak "dumb".
 
It is pretty stupid, but she obviously didn't know what the damn machine was. If you've never flown or seen an x-ray machine... I guess you wouldn't know what to do.
 
Originally posted by: bum
It is pretty stupid, but she obviously didn't know what the damn machine was. If you've never flown or seen an x-ray machine... I guess you wouldn't know what to do.

Well, what kind of mother would just put their baby in a mysterious bin and send it through a machine? If she didn't know what it was she obviously shouldn't have sent her kid through it.
 
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
Airport X-Ray machines barely have any power. It's less radiation than the kid would get if he broke a bone. I mean, the machines at the airport won't even fog 1600 speed photographic film.

ZV
:thumbsup:
the radiation levels are too low to hurt a kid, no big deal
 
now you call can remember this moment before you ask the question "Man, look at all of these stupid warning signs, why is there a no baby sign infront of the xray machine?"

It is because of things like this that gives us reason to have all those retarded warning signs on everything.
 
From TFA:

The unidentified 56-year-old woman who sent the baby through the machine apparently did not understand English, something that may have contributed to the mix-up, according to the Times.

It's a shame this person has already passed on her genetic legacy, because she is pretty goddamned stupid.
 
Originally posted by: slayer202
56 year old grandparent. enough said?

The grandparent part, yes. Why is the month-old baby with the grandparent? The 56 year old part means nothing. You can have a kid at 28 who has his own kid at 28 and be a 56 year old grandparent - it means nothing except that you may be an elitist.
 
Back
Top