• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Awesome Albino Moose Pics!

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Did you take the time to read what I posted, finally, in my OP?

And, did you read the snopes article? It even says the pics may be genuine, just that they're probably not true albino moose.

yes i did... not only are they NOT true albino meese... they're not even in Wisconsin.

but... i guess we can add 'supposedly' to all claims... and even if theyre wrong, it makes it ok?
🙄
 
yes i did... not only are they NOT true albino meese... they're not even in Wisconsin.
Yep, dalmatian moose hybrids
albino_moose_2sfw.jpg
 
but... i guess we can add 'supposedly' to all claims... and even if theyre wrong, it makes it ok?
🙄

Even if you know for a fact the statement is wrong? No, of course not.

But you don't know for an undeniable fact that my statement, even without the KEY qualifier of "supposedly", is wrong. You . . . just . . . don't. Below is why. Full reading comprehension of the nopes article for the win.


yes i did... not only are they NOT true albino meese... they're not even in Wisconsin.

Troll fail on your part. You should have added "supposedly." The Snopes article says, "As best we can ascertain . . . they were taken in Canada."

You understand what that means, don't you? It means "supposedly." 😛

It's no blanket claim of fact like your statement -- "they're not even in Wisconsin" is.

yes i did... not only are they NOT true albino meese...

*Snicker*

Pro tip: When you set out to make fun of someone else's fail, it helps not to fail so hard and often your own damn self.

Next time, troll smarter, not harder. ()🙂
 
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/moose

moose (plural moose, (chiefly humorous) meese, (dated, rare) mooses)

You are correct. It's real joke to cite the "Wikitionary" for anything. 😛

http://www.webster-dictionary.org/definition/Meese

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/meese

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/meese

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/meese

http://dictionary.cambridge.org/spellcheck/british/?q=meese

http://oxforddictionaries.com/spellcheck/?region=uk&q=meese


I mean, Wisconsin is a joke for many . . . you know, to quote an internet sage, chiefly humorous, but you didn't see me using that for an excuse! 😉 😛
 
You are correct. It's real joke to cite the "Wikitionary" for anything.

actually the real joke is to post an 'email chain' you got from some source, and assume its true without researching it.

c'mon.. how long you been on ATOT? you know anything false will be found within 5 seconds.


newb 😛
 
Back
Top