Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.
Back well over a year ago, there was a thread at Ars discussing the merits of not using a VHAR WU for a benchmark (it was a 6.7xx at the time for the 2.x & 3.0 clients, IIRC). The discussion revolved around the fact that the best benchmark WU would be one where all or nearly all of the SETI scientific analyses would be taking place (VLARs & VHARs don't have this), in addition to the most prolific WU.
A number of people evaluated past results in the Setiqueues and pretty much concluded that the most distributed AR WU was the "0.417". I know that for myself, having had a queue record of about 1100 results at the time, I found that ~13% of the WUs were 0.417. This was out of an ENORMOUS possible number of WU ARs (considering ARs have been distributed from a range of 0.000 - ~18.000, from what people have reported).
Thus the bench was changed to a 0.417.
Anyone interested in this fascinating thread may check it out here. 🙂
[EDIT: BTW, I know that not every AR is apparently distributed as a WU, so the actual number of ARs that have been sent out is not the theoretical.]
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.