Klandestine
Senior member
- Jan 8, 2005
- 400
- 0
- 0
auto seatbelts were a gimmick and were horrible for safety, someone should have been sued and probably sent to jail
Originally posted by: Forsythe
I recently heard of things that make your chicken like you want it, isntead of an oven. Surprised as hell.
Originally posted by: Colt45
http://homepages.cae.wisc.edu/~tford/seatbelt1.jpg
the top rail (inline with arch of the door) moves back and forth when you open the door. This is just the shoulder part.
the lap belt part still has to be done manually, so I see no point in it whatsoever - is lap belt much easier to do up than lap+shoulder?
Originally posted by: GreenGhost
They were discontinued because most people forget the lap belt, and they are useless without it. Probably they thought it could give some degree of protection, while forcing people to wear the belts, thus creating the habit. At that time, much less people used to wear belts.
Fear from litigation made the co.s to go back to the old design.
Originally posted by: Klandestine
auto seatbelts were a gimmick and were horrible for safety, someone should have been sued and probably sent to jail
Originally posted by: dullard
My 1991 Toyota Tercel had them, and it was done properly. Instead of a sliding belt that could break and isn't as securely attached, the Tercel had it permantenly in one location on the door. No moving parts, nothing to break. Open the door and sit down, when the door closes, the shoulder belt is on and as secure as any regular shoulder belt.
Benefit: Insurance cost was about half that of similar cars without it.
Drawback: People who didn't know about it were confused and always attempted to wriggle their way over the belt (nearly impossible) while getting into the car. They just can't understand the concept of opening the door and sitting down as normal.
