• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Auto.com reviews GM's new Cadillac CTS

Oh come on now, it's not that bad. Looks clean and sharp. The Aztec holds first, second, and THIRD place for worst looks in my book.
 


<< Oh come on now, it's not that bad. Looks clean and sharp. The Aztec holds first, second, and THIRD place for worst looks in my book. >>


It looks like a Aztec bumped uglies with a Seville...not a good match.

MORE PICS
 
It seems that the GM Style Engineers (and I use this term loosely) of late have been formerly employed by Hot Wheels!
 


<< Oh come on now, it's not that bad. Looks clean and sharp. >>


I agree. There have been many, many worse looking concept vehicles, like the Jeep Liberty.

Oh wait, they're actually selling those?
 


<<

<< Oh come on now, it's not that bad. Looks clean and sharp. >>


I agree. There have been many, many worse looking concept vehicles, like the Jeep Liberty.

Oh wait, they're actually selling those? >>


The liberty was never a concept vehicle.
 
That thing looks like the family truckster from NL Vacation.

Wally World anyone??
 
Damn, if they could just get the front fascia to look appealing. Unfortunately that's what makes or breaks the car, and most concepts I've seen lately have been broken by an unappealing front fascia setup...
 


<< The liberty was never a concept vehicle. >>


Maybe it wasn't called the "Liberty" but Jeep showed off a vehicle that looked like it several years ago that looked like crap that I never imagined they'd build. Lo and behold, they've released it. Maybe "concept vehicle" was the incorrect term.
 
It's not that ugly...

What I mean by that is it's not straight up ugly, like the Aztec. This is far more subject to opinion.
 
Ugleee!

I am exactly in that customer range that Cadillac is trying to re-establish itself in and I would never buy that thing no matter how well it handles. I liked the Catera when it was an Opel but the CTS is so ugly it wouldn't even cross my mind to even look at it.

Yuck
 
I think it's ugly as well. I hope this thing sells poorly so Cadillac will put an end to this "art and science" (or whatever it's called) design theme. Blech.
 
i saw a white CTS yesterday at Krogers. It looks MUCH better in person. I was drooling all over it... But, White leather is not very pretty 🙂
 


<< Hey, at least it has a very nice interior! 🙂 >>


That's impossible if it is a GM product, as GM and crap interiors are synonymous. GM wonders why people look at imports and what they need to look at are the insides of the vehicles. For the love of humanity, do SOMETHING about the hard plastics and the gaps between trim pieces already. And must every AC-Delco radio have those stupid chunky buttons and feel like a Fisher-Price toy? Ugh.
 


<< Hey, at least it has a very nice interior! 🙂 >>


Good GAWD NO. It looks overtly plasticy and the dash is too "TALL." It looks like it belongs in a pickup truck.
 
Its an outstanding GM product.

Unfortunately, that means its only above average compared to the rest of the market.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top