• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Australian Open

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: Casawi

They claimed if Roger Federer lost this morning and Nadal one it. He could loose his number one spot. That is because The Australian Open is the first Slam, and Roger won it last year... so he wouldn't be getting any credit for making thus far.

I hope this wasn't boring material.

i thought it was a rolling calendar
 
Originally posted by: Nitemare
Originally posted by: Casawi

They claimed if Roger Federer lost this morning and Nadal one it. He could loose his number one spot. That is because The Australian Open is the first Slam, and Roger won it last year... so he wouldn't be getting any credit for making thus far.

I hope this wasn't boring material.

i thought it was a rolling calendar

It is. That's why it might have happened. Nadal would have two of the four slams and made the finals in wimbledon, plus a lot of other good tournament results.
 
What and upset by Djokovic. He played amazing and redeemed him self from the last lost to Roger in a slam( Was it the US open?).
 
Back
Top