Aussie Dr. Evil is building his giant laser!

sdifox

No Lifer
Sep 30, 2005
100,884
18,083
126
http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/space-junk-zapping-lasers-under-development-1.2566600


It may sound like science fiction but an Australian team is working on a project to zap orbital debris with lasers from Earth to reduce the growing amount of space junk that threatens to knock out satellites with a "cascade of collisions".
The project is very realistic and likely to be working in the next 10 years, Matthew Colless, director of Australian National University's Research School of Astronomy and Astrophysics, told Reuters.
"It's important that it's possible on that scale because there's so much space junk up there," he said. "We're perhaps only a couple of decades away from a catastrophic cascade of collisions ... that takes out all the satellites in low orbit."

Australia now has a contract with NASA, the U.S. space agency, to track and map space junk with a telescope equipped with an infrared laser at Mount Stromlo Observatory.
But $20 million from the Australian government and $40 million in private investment will help the team set up as the Cooperative Research Centre (CRC) to develop better lasers to track tiny pieces of debris, importing techniques from astronomy used to remove the blurring of the atmosphere.
The ultimate aim is to increase the power of the lasers to illuminate and zap pieces of junk so they burn up harmlessly as they fall through the upper atmosphere.
"There's no risk of missing and hitting a working satellite," Colless said. "We can target them precisely. We really don't miss."
Colless said he imagines an eventual need for a global network of stations set up under international auspices but, right now, the CRC is doing the research to make it possible.
The CRC is made up of universities, space agencies and companies including Lockheed Martin, Optus and EOS Space System Australia.
 

Fatdog

Golden Member
Nov 10, 2000
1,001
0
76
I hope they get the targeting software right the first time. It would suck to set the moon on fire.
 

vi edit

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 28, 1999
62,484
8,345
126
What kind of power and cooling...not mention lense would it take to zap objects in orbit from earth? That's one big freaking big beam of light.
 

JManInPhoenix

Golden Member
Sep 25, 2013
1,500
1
81
I can't find a link but a few years ago I remember seeing some "documentary" on the history channel about all kinds of catastrophic things that would happen if the moon was not there. (since this is the channel the thinks aliens built every ancient wonder I don't know how much credence that has...)
 

Gibsons

Lifer
Aug 14, 2001
12,530
35
91
pic of scientist
234484.jpg
 

vi edit

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 28, 1999
62,484
8,345
126
I can't find a link but a few years ago I remember seeing some "documentary" on the history channel about all kinds of catastrophic things that would happen if the moon was not there. (since this is the channel the thinks aliens built every ancient wonder I don't know how much credence that has...)

I think the moon has a huge impact on how fast (or more accurately, slowly) the Earth rotates, it also helps keep us from wobbling as much in orbit. Not to mention the whole tides thing and full moon lighting.
 

khon

Golden Member
Jun 8, 2010
1,318
124
106
Why place the laser on earth ? It's incredibly difficult to keep the beam intensity high enough when shooting through the atmosphere.

Would be so much easier if the laser was mounted on an airplane flying at high altitude.
 

sdifox

No Lifer
Sep 30, 2005
100,884
18,083
126
I can't find a link but a few years ago I remember seeing some "documentary" on the history channel about all kinds of catastrophic things that would happen if the moon was not there. (since this is the channel the thinks aliens built every ancient wonder I don't know how much credence that has...)

err, yeah, mass species extinction that would make our effort look laughable.
 

khon

Golden Member
Jun 8, 2010
1,318
124
106
Power requirements to weaponize it are not compatible with flight.

Not true.

The power requirements are much, much lower if the laser is in high altitude, and you could easily get hundreds of kW from a battery bank, or several megawatts from a gas turbine.