• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Audio of the explosives which brought down WTC 7

Page 58 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
oh? how can you state the low rumblings are not from explosions, when a few words earlier you state the rumblings are mixed with the explosions?

i could take your ridiculous argument and apply it to wtc7. "low rumblings" caught on audio for wtc7 occurred (even though no visible sign of wtc7 collapsed yet) because the building collapsing was mixed in with explosives.

to further illustrate your ridiculous argument that explosives can't sound like low rumblings, this video footage inside the stadium clearly has explosives going off that sound like deep rumblings due to the placement of explosives and camera / microphone type.

deep booms and rumblings as the explosives are initially set off, no collapse has started yet. damn, there goes your "stadium collapsing solely causing the rumblings" argument LOL:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=brB2MaaVRrY&feature=related

another one with deep rumblings and loud bangs before any collapse has started:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14OQByZRxWc#t=6m29s

thanks for playing kids.

You really don't hear the difference? Yes, there is echoing of the explosion, but there is also LOUD pops that can be heard besides the echoing. (And I certainly wouldn't classify the echoing as "rumbling" certainly not the same type of noise heard in the WTC7 videos).
 
You really don't hear the difference? Yes, there is echoing of the explosion, but there is also LOUD pops that can be heard besides the echoing. (And I certainly wouldn't classify the echoing as "rumbling" certainly not the same type of noise heard in the WTC7 videos).

in other words, you are admitting that explosives being set off can sound like deep rumblings due to a wide range of factors, including camera placement, microphone type, explosive location placement, distance, etc.

that supports my argument 100%, destroys your ridiculous claim that only the stadium collapsing caused deep rumblings. thanks for playing, mr. jfk in my sig LOL!

edit1: great video! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=brB2MaaVRrY&feature=related

in the first 15 seconds, almost all the explosives being set off cause a deep rumble. only a few of them can be considered as loud bangs on audio. good stuff. RIP your ridiculous argument (again and again) Cogman LOL.

edit 2: and no, those aren't "echoes" as you claim, since you can clearly see flashes going off at the same time you hear the deep rumblings. LOL at echoes.

edit3: come on xjohnx, enjoy that crow!
 
Last edited:
in other words, you are admitting that explosives being set off can sound like deep rumblings due to a wide range of factors, including camera placement, microphone type, explosive location placement, distance, etc.

that supports my argument 100%, destroys your ridiculous claim that only the stadium collapsing caused deep rumblings. thanks for playing, mr. jfk in my sig LOL!

edit1: great video! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=brB2MaaVRrY&feature=related

in the first 15 seconds, almost all the explosives being set off cause a deep rumble. only a few of them can be considered as loud bangs on audio. good stuff. RIP your ridiculous argument (again and again) Cogman LOL.

edit 2: and no, those aren't "echoes" as you claim, since you can clearly see flashes going off at the same time you hear the deep rumblings. LOL at echoes.

edit3: come on xjohnx, enjoy that crow!

Again, you are an idiot if you think the WTC7 clip sounds anything like the explosion. I've not admitted anything other then the fact that there are DISTINCT explosive sounds, not rumbling. Echoing != rumbling.
 
Again, you are an idiot if you think the WTC7 clip sounds anything like the explosion. I've not admitted anything other then the fact that there are DISTINCT explosive sounds, not rumbling. Echoing != rumbling.

Ah, then you can continue to live in your fairy tale world where the deep rumblings are "echoes" in your mind, despite the fact that flashes of light from the detonations are seen at the exact same time the bombs are going off, which are recorded as deep booms on audio. edit: sure, there are "bangs" as well, but the bangs are clearly in the minority.

the WTC7 pre collapse explosions on audio are indeed deep thunder booms / rumblings, similar to the ones I just posted from dallas stadium. I don't need you admitting anything when it took you over a month to admit you were dead wrong about your ludicrous JFK claim in my sig. also, no two demolitions will ever sound exactly alike, so drop that ridiculous argument already.

point stands, and i've proven that explosive detonations can sound like deep thunder booms, similar to that of WTC7. tell me how that crow tastes (again), son.
 
it's ok, keep talking about elvis while continuing to dodge sunder, romero, and the explosions on audio.

dodge more, pussy!
Haven't you ever wondered why Sunder and Romero don't bring up Elvis? Could it be because they're in on it with him, hmmm? Makes you think, doesn't it?

And the sounds you think you hear in the audio isn't explosions. It's Elvis's fat ass jumping up and down in the Penthouse to weaken the steel structure and collapse WTC7. That's why the Penthoue was first to go. It's so obvious because when you listen to the audio you can barely hear him belting out a bluesy rendition of Hound Dog. You may not be able to hear if you have crappy speakers or headphones though.
 
I seriously have never seen anyone that is as big of a liar as al981.

funny, you are now directly contradicting cogman LOL.

No, there's no contradiction, you are making things up. You live in a fantasy where just saying something makes it true. There is nothing resembling explosions from demolitions in the 9/11 videos, and grasping at every straw you can will not make them appear. Now I suspect you will post something along the lines of I am saying that there were no explosions in the 9/11.
 
I seriously have never seen anyone that is as big of a liar as al981.

Me a liar? hardly. If I make a mistake on a point or a simple mistatement, I gladly acknowledge it and correct it (ie, acknowledging a simple mistatement of "eutectic", but the fact still remains wtc7 steel melted as acknowledged by FEMA). You on the other hand, repeatedly lie, like LyingChicken, and when you do get thoroughly owned, you refuse to acknowledge anything, and choose to dodge or continue lying. a few examples as to the extent of your beatdowns: your ridiculous "hand of god" statement and your claim that "no demolitions have explosions going off 10+ seconds beforehand" bullshit, both of which i pleasantly destroyed. how did you not know that basic fact about explosives and demolitions, as someone who claims to work with explosives? utter fail.

of course, i'm dealing with the biggest moron on anandtech, who openly brags and claims he "is not open minded" and laughably expects to be taken seriously. the best part is, you don't even realize just how pathetic that statement is and how it works against you LOL.

Originally Posted by xj0hnx
And? I'm close minded,

Originally Posted by xj0hnx
I never claimed to be open minded

Originally Posted by xj0hnx
The camera shakes because ...someone touches it. BWAHAHAHAHAHA the camera shaking BEFORE collapse?


kek^^ good stuff! gtfo, moron.



No, there's no contradiction, you are making things up. You live in a fantasy where just saying something makes it true. There is nothing resembling explosions from demolitions in the 9/11 videos, and grasping at every straw you can will not make them appear. Now I suspect you will post something along the lines of I am saying that there were no explosions in the 9/11.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=brB2MaaVRrY

add this to the list of you repeatedly getting owned. videos such as these taken at the demolition of dallas stadium prove that low deep rumblings can result from explosives detonating. the deep rumblings and booms clearly outnumber any "bangs" in the first 15 seconds. it also destroys your argument that the "low rumbling is the stadium collapsing" b.s which tried pushing in post #1419. Now that you have been proven dead wrong, man up and acknowledge that basic fact that the explosive detonations in the above link caused deep rumbling sounds to be recorded on audio. go ahead, pussy. don't use cogman's pathetic "echo" excuse for the rumblings either. the flashes of light at the same exact moment of those deep rumblings prove they are not "echoes" LOL.

now, while we wait for you to man up and enjoy crow like cogman did today, these deep rumblings support my argument 100% that distance, camera types, microphone types, explosive placement, and numerous other factors can make explosions have a deep boom / rumbling sound on audio. common sense 101. go ahead and admit that too, pussy.

xjohnx = repeatedly abused and owned.
 
Last edited:
Haven't you ever wondered why Sunder and Romero don't bring up Elvis?

I just keep wondering how a kid your age hasn't grown a sack and continues to dodge like a pussy when cornered 🙂 It was certainly fun feeding you crow the past few months...so much so that you can only talk about elvis now LOL.

keep dodging, pussy!
 
I just keep wondering how a kid your age hasn't grown a sack and continues to dodge like a pussy when cornered 🙂 It was certainly fun feeding you crow the past few months...so much so that you can only talk about elvis now LOL.

keep dodging, pussy!
Like I figured. I knew you'd avoid any and all questions about Elvis because your case is weak, and you've been led astray by Elvis's propaganda arm that developed the whole truther story as a distraction in the first place. The RIAA (the real entity behind 9/11, Elvis was merely the brains) is laughing their ass off at you for your gullibility.
 
Like I figured. I knew you'd avoid any and all questions about Elvis because your case is weak, and you've been led astray by Elvis's propaganda arm that developed the whole truther story as a distraction in the first place. The RIAA (the real entity behind 9/11, Elvis was merely the brains) is laughing their ass off at you for your gullibility.

You are being so disengenuous TLC. Elvis was in the DEA prior to being in the RIAA. He was promoted by Reagan in the late 80's specifically for bringing the towers down in 2001. They knew about and planned everything, even Clinton's Presidency--up til 2001. There are secret records at Area 51 with Bush 41, Regean and GWB discussing this very thing. Now Red West, a high school chum of E and member of the Memphis Mafia was the individual in charge of explosives. He brought them in using guitar cases and as would see fit, the phospherous charge could be made into guitar cables. The detonator's were in the drumkit. This is were it gets complicated so stay with me. The Colonel having to control everything Elvis did was now in charge of security at WTC. The ex-FBI agent in charge was just a front so the then President George Bush could look serious about security. The colonel, I know just stay with me, could then actively help Red bring in all the supplies needed. Now Elvis during this entire period of supplying the WTC with 10 million tons of explosives, was working on what he called the 'anti-newton' machine. This would bring the towers down at a faster rate than normal. But somehow during the confusion it was shipped to WTC 7 for storage. During 9/11 they realized this and luckily there was enough damage by the falling towers that they could use the aforementioned Anti-Newton machine to bring down WTC 7. The reason for this is unknown. What is known the individual that said 'Pull it' meaning WTC 7 is not Larry Silverstein, but another Memphis Mafia member Cliff Gleaves impersonating Silverstein. The song used to detonate all the explosives was actually 'Burning Love' another FACT you, TLC choose to overlook and I fully expect you to dodge this part of the story! I could go on but why waste my time, you will simply ignore the facts above!

Now, TLC you can continue on using physics, metallurgy and other "sciences". But we know what happened, we are aware of your blindness.
 
Only in your delusional, feeble mind.

haha, no surprise you completely dodged post#1432 as i destroyed your defense of the official story. nailed you to a T. absolutely owned!

hey LyingChicken, don't worry, I'll throw all those contradictions in your face again in a few days. until then, keep dodging and mentioning elvis, you pussy :awe:

^^

edit: hey, where's beaujingles or however you spell his name? he spent almost a month denying the fact that any pre collapse explosions or rumblings occurred, then self destructed / contradicted himself by saying the explosions were...wait for it.... "other explosions". he hasn't been back since? Lulz found.
 
Last edited:
1. Wow I can't believe this idiot thread is still alive.

2. Are you really arguing based on your ear's analysis of a few shitty audio recordings?

Truthers IMO are a bunch of lonely bored idiots with nothing better to do but make up bat-shit crazy theories to use their excessive number of idle brain cycles.

Get a life people.
 
1. Wow I can't believe this idiot thread is still alive.

2. Are you really arguing based on your ear's analysis of a few shitty audio recordings?

Truthers IMO are a bunch of lonely bored idiots with nothing better to do but make up bat-shit crazy theories to use their excessive number of idle brain cycles.

Get a life people.

1) I remember you from previous 9/11 threads. you usually mouth off like an idiot, lose your cool because you failed to defend the official storyline, then nerdrage and quit the thread never to be seen for a few months until the next 9/11 thread. this will be no different.

2) the audio is proof of explosions on audio, and directly contradicts the government's claim that no pre collapse explosions on audio exist. go ahead, let's see how much of a man you are and admit deep thunder booms exist. as soon as you admit that basic fact, you can invent an explanation why NIST lied and stated no explosions (whatever they may be from) on audio exist^^.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sI2gP7_xdA#t=1m48s

oh, your "shitty audio" comment is bunk too, considering ground eyewitnesses reported huge explosions a few seconds prior to wtc7's collapse. enjoy your crow, son!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sI2gP7_xdA#t=4m05s


edit: oh, have fun reading my sig. LOL!
 
Last edited:
hey LyingChicken, don't worry, I'll throw all those contradictions in your face again in a few days. until then, keep dodging and mentioning elvis, you pussy :awe:
Elvis says that the truthers are looking at the wrong "ite." It was actually nano-Kryptonite that was planted. (Elvis has connections to Lex Luther because LL was a big fan of his early stuff and loves the movie Blue Hawaii.)

We'll never find out the truth though because NIST DID NOT test for nano-Kryptonite. Let me repeat that...NIST DID NOT test for nano-Kryptonite. That oversight is a HUGE smoking gun and implicates NIST in the coverup.
 
LOL! keep on dodging, LyingChicken!

I know right, he just completely ignored my post! He knows the truth! He knows that Lex Luthor wasn't working alone on nano kryptonite. Nano kryptonite is key in helping the 'anti-newton' machine's mini flux capacitor run without increasing it's carbon footprint. Elvis is a astrophysics genious!
 
49912783462864750910.jpg
 
I just got back from my trip, and while I followed the thread in NZ since internet access was all over the place there, I gave up on the thread in Sidney and just now read the last page of this thread to find Doboji's most recent post ironicly sums up the situation here well:

1. Wow I can't believe this idiot thread is still alive.

2. Are you really arguing based on your ear's analysis of a few shitty audio recordings?
Truthers IMO are a bunch of lonely bored idiots with nothing better to do but make up bat-shit crazy theories to use their excessive number of idle brain cycles.

Get a life people.

This thread should have concluded long ago, but you 9/11 deniers are dismissing the audio recordings the explosions which brought down WTC, along with all the eye witness reports of the same, simply because those two recordings are far less than ideal, and rather from a interview mic four blocks away and and a snipit of the last explosion according to a camera mic which had multiple buildings in the way.

Of course those random recordings are "shitty" in comparison to pre-planned recordings of publicly planned demolitions, it takes some idiotic analysis to expect otherwise, but you falsers are obviously too obsessed with your fanciful lives to have any brain cycles available to come to terms with what is happening here in real life. I talked to various people about this topic while circling the globe, and the only few I found who were sold on the official story were the few of my fellow Americans who it came up on conversation with. When will you guys start getting a grip on reality? Perhaps this interview with Col. Lawrence Wilkerson, former Chief of Staff for Collen Powell, might help to get some gears turning for at least somone here?
 
I just got back from my trip, and while I followed the thread in NZ since internet access was all over the place there, I gave up on the thread in Sidney and just now read the last page of this thread to find Doboji's most recent post ironicly sums up the situation here well:



This thread should have concluded long ago, but you 9/11 deniers are dismissing the audio recordings the explosions which brought down WTC, along with all the eye witness reports of the same, simply because those two recordings are far less than ideal, and rather from a interview mic four blocks away and and a snipit of the last explosion according to a camera mic which had multiple buildings in the way.

Of course those random recordings are "shitty" in comparison to pre-planned recordings of publicly planned demolitions, it takes some idiotic analysis to expect otherwise, but you falsers are obviously too obsessed with your fanciful lives to have any brain cycles available to come to terms with what is happening here in real life. I talked to various people about this topic while circling the globe, and the only few I found who were sold on the official story were the few of my fellow Americans who it came up on conversation with. When will you guys start getting a grip on reality? Perhaps this interview with Col. Lawrence Wilkerson, former Chief of Staff for Collen Powell, might help to get some gears turning for at least somone here?

welcome back.

small edit: RIP to all those who lost their lives on 9/11. We will never forget. Truth and justice for all.

summary when you were gone:

1) beaujingles gone from the thread after owning himself. for months, he claimed no explosions existed, then owned himself by admitting the supposed non existant explosions were in fact... explosions of some nature. haha wut? he also used xjohnx's "hand of god" excuse for sauret's camera shaking about 10+ seconds before the north tower's collapse. too funny!

2) xjohnx repeatedly getting owned, including post #1432 where it is proven explosive detonations can indeed sound like deep thunder booms.

3) cogman repeatedly getting owned, see #2 and my sig LOL.

4) LyingDodgingChicken continually dodging multiple official story contradictions, including Sunder contradicting national geofailgraphic, Romero's demolition statement, WTC7 steel that was classified as having been melted, and refusing to acknowledge that the WTC7 pre collapse explosions on audio directly contradict NIST's claim that no explosions on audio exist. Keep dodging, pussy!
 
Last edited:
Back
Top