Audio of the explosives which brought down WTC 7

[kylebisme]

There's nothing funny about the massive cover-up of what happened on 9/11, not one funny thing in it at all.

 

[flexy]

I have to admit that simply googling for "word trade center explosives" yields some INTERESTING reads. Not all of them seem from nutcases.

If i'd just "go with it" ...leads to one simple question: WHY?

Why the need for controlled demolitions?

 

[kylebisme]

I'd like to catch whoever did it so we can ask them, which is why I'm trying to build the political support for a proper criminal investigation.

 

[al981]

I have to admit that simply googling for "word trade center explosives" yields some INTERESTING reads. Not all of them seem from nutcases.

If i'd just "go with it" ...leads to one simple question: WHY?

Why the need for controlled demolitions?

in the 1993 WTC basement bombing, the FBI knew in advance and provided live explosives for the terrorists... from the new york times, cbsnews:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5F1Y6cGRXEs

nobody in america really cared about the bombing because the towers were still standing...you heard no massive calls for "revenge" or invading the middle east.

how do you get the country pissed off enough so every citizen is calling for revenge and a blank check to invade the middle east for <insert oil or other reason here>? by bringing down those towers. demolition provides that certainty.

 

[Kirby]

in the 1993 WTC basement bombing, the FBI knew in advance and provided live explosives for the terrorists... from the new york times, cbsnews:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5F1Y6cGRXEs

nobody in america really cared about the bombing because the towers were still standing...you heard no massive calls for "revenge" or invading the middle east.

how do you get the country pissed off enough so every citizen is calling for revenge and a blank check to invade the middle east for <insert oil or other reason here>? by bringing down those towers. demolition provides that certainty.

Laugh
My
Fucking
Ass
Off

 

[al981]

Laugh
My
Fucking
Ass
Off

oh look, it's nkgreen, still dodging the jfk thread? 😀

since you've popped up here in this thread (and didn't bother to refute the link i posted...big surprise), please invent an explanation why there was no blood, tissue, or cloth found on the magic bullet that supposedly exited kennedy's body, and supposedly destroyed multiple bones in the governor's body. ready, set, dodge! ^_^

 

[QuantumPion]

I hate the internet sometimes.

 

[Cogman]

oh look, it's nkgreen, still dodging the jfk thread? 😀

since you've popped up here in this thread (and didn't bother to refute the link i posted...big surprise), please invent an explanation why there was no blood, tissue, or cloth found on the magic bullet that supposedly exited kennedy's body, and supposedly destroyed multiple bones in the governor's body. ready, set, dodge! ^_^

The earth is FLAT!! See, here's a link http://theflatearthsociety.org/cms/ And I know you can't refute it!!!

 

[MotF Bane]

I hate the internet sometimes.

Internet: uniting stupidity and insanity since 19something.

 

[kylebisme]

The earth is FLAT!! See, here's a link http://theflatearthsociety.org/cms/ And I know you can't refute it!!!

Al linked to a CBS news report, and here is a NYT article stating the same facts:

Law-enforcement officials were told that terrorists were building a bomb that was eventually used to blow up the World Trade Center, and they planned to thwart the plotters by secretly substituting harmless powder for the explosives, an informer said after the blast.

The informer was to have helped the plotters build the bomb and supply the fake powder, but the plan was called off by an F.B.I. supervisor who had other ideas about how the informer, Emad A. Salem, should be used, the informer said.

Deal with it.

 

[Ns1]

//edit

eh fuck it, can't handle another one of these

 

[Cogman]

Al linked to a CBS news report, and here is a NYT article stating the same facts:


Deal with it.

Not until you prove the earth isn't flat! Obviously you can't, that's why you are side-stepping.

 

[Kirby]

oh look, it's nkgreen, still dodging the jfk thread? 😀

since you've popped up here in this thread (and didn't bother to refute the link i posted...big surprise), please invent an explanation why there was no blood, tissue, or cloth found on the magic bullet that supposedly exited kennedy's body, and supposedly destroyed multiple bones in the governor's body. ready, set, dodge! ^_^

I didn't watch the youtube video because I know you're a fucking dumbass.

The only time you ever post is in these conspiracy theory threads, and each time you come off as a loon who masturbates in his own fecal matter.

When are you going to start a thread about the moon landing fake? Or how Xenu brought billions of aliens to earth, put them into volcanoes and blew them up with hydrogen bombs?

 

[kylebisme]

Not until you prove the earth isn't flat! Obviously you can't, that's why you are side-stepping.

I can easily prove our Earth is not flat to a reasonable person, but I've no reason to try proving it to you, as you constantly demonstrate yourself as lacking any semblance of reason at all.

When are you going to start a thread about the moon landing fake?

If you've got some actual evidence to prove the moon landing was fake, please make your own thread about it to share. If not, keep your crackpot conspiracy theories to yourself.

 

[Kirby]

If you've got some actual evidence to prove the moon landing was fake, please make your own thread about it to share. If not, keep your crackpot conspiracy theories to yourself.

I really wish you'd take your own advice.

 

[soulcougher73]

Dont worry Kylebisme. Im with you. Most people dont like to think because it hurts their heads when in the sand.

 

[Ns1]

dude, according to your OP

"I've come across a recording of a sequence of explosions in the moments prior to the building coming down, albeit very faint as it was captured by an interview mic four blocks away"

a faint recording of an explosion captured four blocks away is more credible evidence then cameras rolling as 2 giant airplanes crashed into the WTC

think about it for a second.

"surely nobody has a sound argument to suggest the destruction of WTC 7 was anything but a controlled demolition"

my sound argument is that 2 giant planes crashed into the goddamn WTC and brought that shit down, which is without a doubt way more credible than your evidence.


//edit

ah fuck I got snared in.

 

[kylebisme]

I really wish you'd take your own advice.

My advice to you doesn't apply to me here, as I've provided actual evidence.

"I've come across a recording of a sequence of explosions in the moments prior to the building coming down, albeit very faint as it was captured by an interview mic four blocks away"

a faint recording of an explosion captured four blocks away is more credible evidence then cameras rolling as 2 giant airplanes crashed into the WTC

think about it for a second.

Perhaps if you could manage to think about it for a full second, you'd understand how absurd blaming the destruction of WTC 7 on the two planes that hit WTC 1 & 2 is.

 

[Ns1]

Perhaps if you could manage to think about it for a full second, you'd understand how absurd blaming the destruction of WTC 7 on the two planes that hit WTC 1 & 2 is.

and somehow a faint audio recording of an explosion 4 blocks away from the WTC confirms said explosion came from WTC 7?

 

[Cogman]

I can easily prove our Earth is not flat to a reasonable person, but I've no reason to try proving it to you, as you constantly demonstrate yourself as lacking any semblance of reason at all.


If you've got some actual evidence to prove the moon landing was fake, please make your own thread about it to share. If not, keep your crackpot conspiracy theories to yourself.

And now you know exactly how I've felt for the past 2 threads of your useless drivel. Don't you see how stupid you look? Constantly posting links to people who are just as nutty as yourself, Ignoring and side-stepping questions you can't answer, and then bring up irrelevant pieces of information to try and make your stance look more credible. It is EXACTLY the same. You've tried bring up nano-thermite, physics, the angle which the building has fallen, ect. And EVERY time when someone answers your question, you quickly ignore the answer only to bring it up again 3 posts later.

Any reasonable person can quickly piece together these three facts.
1. Nobody had anything to gain from the demolition of the WTC besides the terrorists that crashed the planes into the buildings.
2. SEVERAL videos show the planes hitting the buildings, and the buildings falling. That alone should be proof enough that "Yes, planes hitting buildings is enough to make them collapse".
3. EVERY argument to the contrary would involve a MASSIVE coverup on the level that the Flat earthers propose. So many people involved and we can't even cover up a sex scandal? Yeah, right....
4. Why even fly airplanes into the building to begin with? Or do you think that was coincidence? Someone has tried to bomb the building before, why would it be suspicious if they did it again? Why even TRY to cover something like that up? "Yep, terrorists had explosives planted in the building as well." Do you REALLY think that phrase would have made everyone go "OMG Conspiracy!!!1!". There would have been NOTHING to gain from hiding an explosion.

But go ahead, cling to your retarded arguments. Ignore teams of nationally recognized engineers for your crackpots.

As for his retarded link, he posted a link that terrorists tried to blow up the WTCs to prove a coverup... Um, yeah.. What does that prove again? Oh, that the FBI MIGHT have been able to stop the bombing (and if you didn't catch it, the guy said "might" about 8 times before the segment).

How many bombings has the FBI prevented? How many do they currently know about? We don't know. Why is one getting through so astounding?

 

[QuantumPion]

Perhaps if you could manage to think about it for a full second, you'd understand how absurd blaming the destruction of WTC 7 on the two planes that hit WTC 1 & 2 is.

You are seriously giving me brain cancer. Fuck you.

 

[Cogman]

Perhaps if you could manage to think about it for a full second, you'd understand how absurd blaming the destruction of WTC 7 on the two planes that hit WTC 1 & 2 is.

Fire from the flaming debris of WTC 1&2 + weight = weakened supports = building falls. It ain't rocket science.

Heating steal causes it to lose strength. The fires in the building are WELL documented. Or are you going to say "Never before has fire melted steal" like your other retarded co-conspiracy theorists?

 

[kylebisme]

You've tried bring up nano-thermite, physics, the angle which the building has fallen, ect. And EVERY time when someone answers your question, you quickly ignore the answer only to bring it up again 3 posts later.

If believe I've ignored any legitimate arguments on the nano-thermite or the physics of how the buildings came down, please quote them and I'll be happy to address them.

 

[Cogman]

If believe I've ignored any legitimate arguments on the nano-thermite or the physics of how the buildings came down, please quote them and I'll be happy to address them.

Shoot, its easier to reference the entire 1000 post threads then to quote each legitimate argument.

 

[kylebisme]

Fire from the flaming debris of WTC 1&2 + weight = weakened supports = building falls. It ain't rocket science.

Your argument isn't science it all, it's sheer crackpottery, which is why neither the official "investigations" nor anyone else has been able to provide experimental confirmation of such notions.