- Jan 12, 2003
- 3,498
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: Whitling
IMO, this is a class move.
Originally posted by: Zebo
What's the signifigance here? Why?
What makes Fitzgerald any less of a political appointee than ashcroft? Does'nt the conflict of intrest still exist?
Investigating yourself must be nice.
Originally posted by: 308nato
Originally posted by: Zebo
What's the signifigance here? Why?
What makes Fitzgerald any less of a political appointee than ashcroft? Does'nt the conflict of intrest still exist?
Investigating yourself must be nice.
Why don't you get off your ass and look into it a little bit and you can answer your own questions.
I'll throw you one bone, when the then new Illinois Republican Senator Fitzgerald (no relation, sorry) appointed Fitzgerald as the District US Attorney, it was solely to have a clean and clear honest investigation into the Republican (RINO) Governor Ryans sorry ass antics. The Daley/Cook County democrat mafia found that to be acceptable. It was the Republicans that put up the fight.
Because of the heat and antics that took place, Senator Fitzgerald will not be running for another term and that is to damn bad. I consider him one of the few honest politicians around and we will probably be saddled with another corrupt prick or prickette (Fitzgerald beat carol Moseley Braun out of her seat) to go along with that turd Durbin.
You take what you can get, and attorney Fitzgerald is about as clean a pick for the task as either side could hope for.
Originally posted by: Zebo
You still don't have the words right if that the ploy you're trying to make...RIIIIGHT: I gave you the opening by using appoint to see if you'd correct me. Since you did'nt I assume you don't know what the hell you're talking about.
It's nominate. But then you knew that eh.
No conflict of intrest lol... Clinton would have billions already spent in special prosecutors and you know it... Or maybe you don't.
Originally posted by: Zebo
You still don't have the words right if that the ploy you're trying to make...RIIIIGHT: I gave you the opening by using appoint to see if you'd correct me.
Originally posted by: xxxxxJohnGaltxxxxx
Originally posted by: Zebo
You still don't have the words right if that the ploy you're trying to make...RIIIIGHT: I gave you the opening by using appoint to see if you'd correct me.
...sort of sounds like a you employed a 'ploy' to me
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Investigating yourself must be nice.
-------------
I know it was for me.
Originally posted by: Zebo
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Investigating yourself must be nice.
-------------
I know it was for me.
We're not talking bout self actualization here though moonie.
Can't believe a special independant prosecutor is'nt being put forth here. Clinton had several for non-treasonous offenses. This barly is making a wave. Scary thing for the CIA guys still in theater, they know don't cross the administration of you're toast.