<<
<< Yes, what a dastardly trick, this "Trying to be able to continue to provide services to those who pay" thing. >>
What's your point? You're thinking a wee bit too much about money and forget other points.
They said "Free e-mail for life" when we signed up, and besides that, they had those ads all over the screen!
Now they are shutting down the system.
>>
It's either shut down free mail, or shut down the company, lay everybody off, liquidate assets, and possibly file bankruptcy I'm sure. I suppose you would make your argument of "But they said free for life!" even if they no longer were in business.
<< I prefer to use an internet-based service, since I travel a lot, and need to access my e-mail from wherever I can. But I'm not going to pay for this "luxury". >>
Then you're not their customer. You're a user of their service. A user they probably can no longer afford to support without some sort of return. (Ad banners, in case you haven't noticed, don't do much to support a company.)
<< I doubt anyone would actually pay them, anyway. >>
If you're a user who wants to keep your e-mail address, you'll pay. That's what they may be hoping for.
<< Some services should remain free. >>
Again, if a company doesn't exist, it's rather hard for them to provide free services.
<< For an Internet-based service requiring fees, they would first need to establish much better filters. After all, I'm not paying them for the privilege of cleaning 200 k of useless junk from my inbox every day. But you eneter a vicious circle then. >>
-Shrug- I've never bothered filtering. Either way, now that they're getting rid of the dead weight (as far as their ledger goes anyway. You're no longer an expense), they may be able to expand their tools.
Like I've said, the company made a decision. It's either take a lot of negative press about killing the free service, or take a lot of negative press later on down the road due to financial issues (which will probably happen anyway, but at least they're trying).