• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Attention grammar nazi?s

glen

Lifer
Attention grammar nazi?s

Aren?t we supposed to say, first, second, third, rather than firstly, secondly, and thirdly?
 
Aren?t we supposed to say, first, second, third, rather than firstly, secondly, and thirdly?

I believe that either is acceptable, but why use firstly when first says exactly the same thing without the extra two letters?
 
Originally posted by: allisolm
Aren?t we supposed to say, first, second, third, rather than firstly, secondly, and thirdly?

I believe that either is acceptable, but why use firstly when first says exactly the same thing without the extra two letters?
:thumbsup:


Why use a large word when a dimunitive one will suffice?
 
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: allisolm
Aren?t we supposed to say, first, second, third, rather than firstly, secondly, and thirdly?

I believe that either is acceptable, but why use firstly when first says exactly the same thing without the extra two letters?
:thumbsup:


Why use a large word when a dimunitive one will suffice?

Says the man who uses 'dimunitive' rather than 'small'. 🙂
 
Originally posted by: KoolAidKid
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: allisolm
Aren?t we supposed to say, first, second, third, rather than firstly, secondly, and thirdly?

I believe that either is acceptable, but why use firstly when first says exactly the same thing without the extra two letters?
:thumbsup:


Why use a large word when a dimunitive one will suffice?

Says the man who uses 'dimunitive' rather than 'small'. 🙂

Thanks Mr. Obvious ... 😉

EDIT -- woohoo 600 posts... (ok ok nutin to celebrate, but woohoo anyway)
 
Originally posted by: KoolAidKid
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: allisolm
Aren?t we supposed to say, first, second, third, rather than firstly, secondly, and thirdly?

I believe that either is acceptable, but why use firstly when first says exactly the same thing without the extra two letters?
:thumbsup:


Why use a large word when a dimunitive one will suffice?
Says the man who uses 'dimunitive' rather than 'small'. 🙂
Uhh...yeah....it's not as funny when the joke has to be explained to you. 😛
 
Originally posted by: Passions
When do you use Nazis and Nazi's?

What's the difference?

That is the Nazi's gun. He wont like you messing with it.
--
There sure are a lot of Nazis here.

Apostrophe before an s generally shows ownership with nouns. It's just a personal pet peeve of mine. Incorrect usage of the apostrophe is so common it's sickening. There's no "room's for rent." There's no grammar nazi's.
 
Originally posted by: Passions
When do you use Nazis and Nazi's?

What's the difference?

Nazis = Plural of Nazi

Nazi's = Implies that something is of or belonging to a Nazi (e.g. "Check out that Grammar Nazi's spelling error)

 
Originally posted by: Encryptic
Originally posted by: Passions
When do you use Nazis and Nazi's?

What's the difference?

Nazis = Plural of Nazi

Nazi's = Implies that something is of or belonging to a Nazi (e.g. "Check out that Grammar Nazi's spelling error)
You forgot to close your quote. 😛
 
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: Encryptic
Originally posted by: Passions
When do you use Nazis and Nazi's?

What's the difference?

Nazis = Plural of Nazi

Nazi's = Implies that something is of or belonging to a Nazi (e.g. "Check out that Grammar Nazi's spelling error)
You forgot to close your quote. 😛

LOL....self-ownage. 😛
 
So, we can finally stop adding "ly" to the words first, second, and third.

Now, can we figure out if it is nazi's or nazis?
 
Originally posted by: glen
So, we can finally stop adding "ly" to the words first, second, and third.

Now, can we figure out if it is nazi's or nazis?

Plurals of acronyms don't require an apostrophe, unless the s could be confused as being part of the acronym itself.

For example: multiple Runabout Sport Xtremes = RSX's so as not to be confused with the RSX Type-S

.·. Nazis :thumbsup:

[Edit] That's not a thumbs up for Nazis, just saying that "Nazis" is the correct form 😱
 
Firstly, I would like to say this is a stupid thread.

Two, everyone should know these things.

C - I'm hungry.

 
Originally posted by: b0mbrman
Originally posted by: glen
So, we can finally stop adding "ly" to the words first, second, and third.

Now, can we figure out if it is nazi's or nazis?

Plurals of acronyms don't require an apostrophe, unless the s could be confused as being part of the acronym itself.

For example: multiple Runabout Sport Xtremes = RSX's so as not to be confused with the RSX Type-S

.·. Nazis :thumbsup:

[Edit] That's not a thumbs up for Nazis, just saying that "Nazis" is the correct form 😱

1337 NAZIS R0XX0R. W00T


Apt Pupil is an awesome movie whose TV commercial had an awesome line used as a sample by Wumpscut in the song "Praise Your Fears"

"If you don't believe in the existance of evil, you have a lot to learn"

:thumbsup:
 
Back
Top