Attention grammar nazi?s

glen

Lifer
Apr 28, 2000
15,995
1
81
Attention grammar nazi?s

Aren?t we supposed to say, first, second, third, rather than firstly, secondly, and thirdly?
 

allisolm

Elite Member
Administrator
Jan 2, 2001
24,986
4,322
136
Aren?t we supposed to say, first, second, third, rather than firstly, secondly, and thirdly?

I believe that either is acceptable, but why use firstly when first says exactly the same thing without the extra two letters?
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Originally posted by: allisolm
Aren?t we supposed to say, first, second, third, rather than firstly, secondly, and thirdly?

I believe that either is acceptable, but why use firstly when first says exactly the same thing without the extra two letters?
:thumbsup:


Why use a large word when a dimunitive one will suffice?
 

KoolAidKid

Golden Member
Apr 29, 2002
1,932
0
76
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: allisolm
Aren?t we supposed to say, first, second, third, rather than firstly, secondly, and thirdly?

I believe that either is acceptable, but why use firstly when first says exactly the same thing without the extra two letters?
:thumbsup:


Why use a large word when a dimunitive one will suffice?

Says the man who uses 'dimunitive' rather than 'small'. :)
 

glen

Lifer
Apr 28, 2000
15,995
1
81
I don't think either way is correct.
I believe only the first way is correct.
 

ABitTooSpicy

Senior member
Jun 30, 2004
923
0
76
Originally posted by: KoolAidKid
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: allisolm
Aren?t we supposed to say, first, second, third, rather than firstly, secondly, and thirdly?

I believe that either is acceptable, but why use firstly when first says exactly the same thing without the extra two letters?
:thumbsup:


Why use a large word when a dimunitive one will suffice?

Says the man who uses 'dimunitive' rather than 'small'. :)

Thanks Mr. Obvious ... ;)

EDIT -- woohoo 600 posts... (ok ok nutin to celebrate, but woohoo anyway)
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Originally posted by: KoolAidKid
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: allisolm
Aren?t we supposed to say, first, second, third, rather than firstly, secondly, and thirdly?

I believe that either is acceptable, but why use firstly when first says exactly the same thing without the extra two letters?
:thumbsup:


Why use a large word when a dimunitive one will suffice?
Says the man who uses 'dimunitive' rather than 'small'. :)
Uhh...yeah....it's not as funny when the joke has to be explained to you. :p
 

royaldank

Diamond Member
Apr 19, 2001
5,440
0
0
Originally posted by: Passions
When do you use Nazis and Nazi's?

What's the difference?

That is the Nazi's gun. He wont like you messing with it.
--
There sure are a lot of Nazis here.

Apostrophe before an s generally shows ownership with nouns. It's just a personal pet peeve of mine. Incorrect usage of the apostrophe is so common it's sickening. There's no "room's for rent." There's no grammar nazi's.
 

Encryptic

Diamond Member
May 21, 2003
8,885
0
0
Originally posted by: Passions
When do you use Nazis and Nazi's?

What's the difference?

Nazis = Plural of Nazi

Nazi's = Implies that something is of or belonging to a Nazi (e.g. "Check out that Grammar Nazi's spelling error)

 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Originally posted by: Encryptic
Originally posted by: Passions
When do you use Nazis and Nazi's?

What's the difference?

Nazis = Plural of Nazi

Nazi's = Implies that something is of or belonging to a Nazi (e.g. "Check out that Grammar Nazi's spelling error)
You forgot to close your quote. :p
 

Encryptic

Diamond Member
May 21, 2003
8,885
0
0
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: Encryptic
Originally posted by: Passions
When do you use Nazis and Nazi's?

What's the difference?

Nazis = Plural of Nazi

Nazi's = Implies that something is of or belonging to a Nazi (e.g. "Check out that Grammar Nazi's spelling error)
You forgot to close your quote. :p

LOL....self-ownage. :p
 

glen

Lifer
Apr 28, 2000
15,995
1
81
So, we can finally stop adding "ly" to the words first, second, and third.

Now, can we figure out if it is nazi's or nazis?
 

b0mbrman

Lifer
Jun 1, 2001
29,471
1
81
Originally posted by: glen
So, we can finally stop adding "ly" to the words first, second, and third.

Now, can we figure out if it is nazi's or nazis?

Plurals of acronyms don't require an apostrophe, unless the s could be confused as being part of the acronym itself.

For example: multiple Runabout Sport Xtremes = RSX's so as not to be confused with the RSX Type-S

.·. Nazis :thumbsup:

[Edit] That's not a thumbs up for Nazis, just saying that "Nazis" is the correct form :eek:
 

jjones

Lifer
Oct 9, 2001
15,425
2
0
Firstly, I would like to say this is a stupid thread.

Two, everyone should know these things.

C - I'm hungry.

 

ribbon13

Diamond Member
Feb 1, 2005
9,343
0
0
Originally posted by: b0mbrman
Originally posted by: glen
So, we can finally stop adding "ly" to the words first, second, and third.

Now, can we figure out if it is nazi's or nazis?

Plurals of acronyms don't require an apostrophe, unless the s could be confused as being part of the acronym itself.

For example: multiple Runabout Sport Xtremes = RSX's so as not to be confused with the RSX Type-S

.·. Nazis :thumbsup:

[Edit] That's not a thumbs up for Nazis, just saying that "Nazis" is the correct form :eek:

1337 NAZIS R0XX0R. W00T


Apt Pupil is an awesome movie whose TV commercial had an awesome line used as a sample by Wumpscut in the song "Praise Your Fears"

"If you don't believe in the existance of evil, you have a lot to learn"

:thumbsup: