-
We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.
++ ATOT official NEF thread part IV ++
Page 33 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
They're like sine waves, except the amplitudes show the instantaneous torque. So the x-axis becomes the average torque value over a brief segment, and the amplitude shows the instantaneous torque that creates the average torque value.
With it, it showed that the peak and trough values for a four were much further from average values than with a six, and eight related to six similarly. The more cylinders, the smoother the power delivery. Which is, of course, an incredibly self-evident result.
With it, it showed that the peak and trough values for a four were much further from average values than with a six, and eight related to six similarly. The more cylinders, the smoother the power delivery. Which is, of course, an incredibly self-evident result.
I still haven't gotten to drive a V8 RWD, ever. Well, other than a truck, and that's nowhere close.
The V8 FWD was an absolutely shitty car with a magnificent LS4 derived short block transverse-mount linked to a four (or maybe five) speed slushbox. The car got somewhere around 270 FWHP, which, although not that imposing - considering a G37 can get the same figure (albeit AWHP or RWHP), along with several other extremely modern V6's - came with a very wide and flat torque curve of a similar figure, and the power response on tap was huge.
It was a little... sluggish? Reluctant? It's not like most 6's and 4's that rev up fast, downshift at the drop of a hat, etc. It revs up slowly, and it rarely downshifts - it obviously has more rotating mass, which would affect it, but perhaps it was significantly overstroked (very likely), which I know improves low RPM performance at the cost of peak RPM operation. But if peak RPM operation has been curbed, then it may also indicate the motor is vulnerable to high impulse?
The V8 FWD was an absolutely shitty car with a magnificent LS4 derived short block transverse-mount linked to a four (or maybe five) speed slushbox. The car got somewhere around 270 FWHP, which, although not that imposing - considering a G37 can get the same figure (albeit AWHP or RWHP), along with several other extremely modern V6's - came with a very wide and flat torque curve of a similar figure, and the power response on tap was huge.
It was a little... sluggish? Reluctant? It's not like most 6's and 4's that rev up fast, downshift at the drop of a hat, etc. It revs up slowly, and it rarely downshifts - it obviously has more rotating mass, which would affect it, but perhaps it was significantly overstroked (very likely), which I know improves low RPM performance at the cost of peak RPM operation. But if peak RPM operation has been curbed, then it may also indicate the motor is vulnerable to high impulse?
sdifox
No Lifer
tired.
sdifox
No Lifer
:'(
sdifox
No Lifer
power on all 4 wheels > power on only 2
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 25K
-
-
-
