ATOT is Officially Dead

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

rudeguy

Lifer
Dec 27, 2001
47,351
14
61
ATHD is in way worse shape. Remember when it was actually worth visiting?

Now there is half a page of spam and maybe 10 posts (not threads) a day.

Its a shame.
 

Lifted

Diamond Member
Nov 30, 2004
5,748
2
0
ATHD is in way worse shape. Remember when it was actually worth visiting?

Now there is half a page of spam and maybe 10 posts (not threads) a day.

Its a shame.

I never buy crap just because it's cheap, but I have been popping in there from time to time when I'm thinking about purchasing something. To make a short story shorter, I visited slick deals for the first time a few days ago.

Agreed about the 1/2 page of spam not helping matters.
 

alkemyst

No Lifer
Feb 13, 2001
83,769
19
81
The thing that bothered me most is the dynamitedata thing. Although AT holds a special place in my heart, there is a lot of competition that doesn't have refer wrap every product link.

not to mention it's one of the most firewalled domains on a corporate network.

I don't get it.
 

rudeguy

Lifer
Dec 27, 2001
47,351
14
61
hell...as long as we are airing laundry, lets let it all out.

The admin have decided that any reference to a black person's race is bannable, even when you are referring to their actions, but any other racial slurs are perfectly fine. Especially if they are aimed at Jews. And a person's religion is more than fair game, its encouraged to insult whatever is most holy to those people.

I don't think I'll ever understand it. We always hear "Anand says this and Anand says that". Well what does Anand say about the admin condoning religious intolerance? How does he feel about "dots or feathers" being perfectly acceptable but "savage" is a bannable word? Targeting a person's deepest beliefs is fair game but insulting their choice in an OS is bannable?

Its stupid.
 

Malak

Lifer
Dec 4, 2004
14,696
2
0
hell...as long as we are airing laundry, lets let it all out.

The admin have decided that any reference to a black person's race is bannable, even when you are referring to their actions, but any other racial slurs are perfectly fine. Especially if they are aimed at Jews. And a person's religion is more than fair game, its encouraged to insult whatever is most holy to those people.

I don't think I'll ever understand it. We always hear "Anand says this and Anand says that". Well what does Anand say about the admin condoning religious intolerance? How does he feel about "dots or feathers" being perfectly acceptable but "savage" is a bannable word? Targeting a person's deepest beliefs is fair game but insulting their choice in an OS is bannable?

Its stupid.

Infractions are not visible so how do you know if anyone gets in trouble? The whole "savage" thing was because people knew and were intentionally being offensive. It is always the same people. In fact that whole thread that got stickied was full of insensitive pricks making light of a very serious topic that is obviously too mature for this forum.
 

ShawnD1

Lifer
May 24, 2003
15,987
2
81
Yup. Banned all the biggest ass hats that made it entertaining.
everyone knows this :'(

I also get a kick out of the ones where someone asks a perfectly valid religious question and the first reply is someone like GA calling the thread author a retard
 

sao123

Lifer
May 27, 2002
12,653
205
106
There was a time when refreshing a page you could barely keep up with all the topics.
Now, there are stretches of minutes between posts.
RIP OT.


most of the topics which were impossible to keep up with were nothing but postcount++ replies, most of it wasnt anything close to real conversation.
 

alkemyst

No Lifer
Feb 13, 2001
83,769
19
81
They are giving infractions now for replying to spammers as thread crapping...we are only supposed to report the posts now. I don't get it.
 

Crono

Lifer
Aug 8, 2001
23,720
1,502
136
They are giving infractions now for replying to spammers as thread crapping...we are only supposed to report the posts now. I don't get it.

There isn't a need to post in reply to spam posts.

Not unless you want to increase your post count or something. But it really doesn't help anyone, and the report function works just fine.
 

Regs

Lifer
Aug 9, 2002
16,666
21
81
Maybe it's the 100 sub cats. I also think they're micromanaging the hell out of the moderation.