SSSnail
Lifer
...my chaffing personality and manletness.
D:
...my chaffing personality and manletness.
I don't think this one is on your list, but it was the first one I could think of when I saw it was you who posted:
![]()
schneiderguy is a:
[ ] Top
[X] Bottom
I don't think this one is on your list, but it was the first one I could think of when I saw it was you who posted:
![]()
i think he's right in your wheelhouse
I was wondering how long it would take until someone realized half of these athletes are underage. Now if you want to end up in prison go ahead, but considering that gymnastics is by the laws of physics best performed by young girls without significant sexual maturation, you're just asking for trouble.Born: December 9, 1995 (age 16)
:sneaky:
I was wondering how long it would take until someone realized half of these athletes are underage. Now if you want to end up in prison go ahead, but considering that gymnastics is by the laws of physics best performed by young girls without significant sexual maturation, you're just asking for trouble.
So my vote is for the shot put. It's safer the way.
They're having the Olympics gymnastic trials a few minutes from me this week. I figure that since the women are competing at a high level they're probably worthy of having sex with me even if some of them aren't very attractive and have bigger muscles than I do.
Here's the list:
http://usagym.org/pages/events/trials/athletes.html
So, you guys choose which one of the females that I should make babbies with and I will obtain pics/possibly n00dz for proof after they fall victim to my charming personality and manliness.
I'm leaning towards Nastia Liukin right now, she's 5'3" so she's capable of forming non-manlet babbies with my help.
Science has yet to determine whether or not manlets can be classified as female. They definitely aren't male.
Your child's forehead would be visible from space. That has to knock her down to a 6.493/10.Srsly guys
Nastia is a 7.847/10, I think she's the best choice out of that lineup.
Yeah....why is that?You can't impregnate any of them, none of them have their periods. 🙁
If it's not due to simply being too young, sometimes very skinny women simply don't have regular ones either. Something to do with very low % of fat in their body and their body says whoa you don't have enough reserves to have a baby to put it bluntly. Do I know of any scientific fact backing this? No but I personally know of several very athletic and lean women in their late 20's and early 30's that don't have a them often.Yeah....why is that?
16 is just right. 😎I was wondering how long it would take until someone realized half of these athletes are underage. Now if you want to end up in prison go ahead, but considering that gymnastics is by the laws of physics best performed by young girls without significant sexual maturation, you're just asking for trouble.
So my vote is for the shot put. It's safer that way.😛
If it's not due to simply being too young, sometimes very skinny women simply don't have regular ones either. Something to do with very low % of fat in their body and their body says whoa you don't have enough reserves to have a baby to put it bluntly. Do I know of any scientific fact backing this? No but I personally know of several very athletic and lean women in their late 20's and early 30's that don't have a them often.
16 is underage?
😵
This is news.
Jesus christ. Talk about a complex. I wouldn't be surprised if this poster is just two midgets in a bathrobe.