• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Atlas Shrugged movie - amazing reviews!!

There was no way this book could have been adapted well into a movie. Unless I was the one that wrote it.
 
yea she isn't a very good story writer, her essays on the subject are far more well thought out and concise.
her novels are just a lot of beating a dead horse and thin but heavily padded out story hung around a few speech lectures. reading her books you almost feel autistic after lol, so the characters are just really flat.
 
The book was a poorly written piece of idiot/simplistic potboiler soap opera fluff masquerading as serious philosophy anyway. Most Marvel Comics have more depth and nuance, plus cooler graphics!

It sucked as literature and was even more laughably lame as serious socio-political commentary.

Libertopians, lol.

They're as bad, as shallow, and as righteously annoying as any other messianic true believer who might knock on your door or corner you in a bar and try to sell you something, thrust a pamphlet in your hand, or convert you.

Libertopians. They just think they're deep, like that 14 year old girl with the braces and the unfortunate skin condition who wouldn't shut up in your Junior High School civics class. 😛
 
Bad movies don't mean the philosophy is wrong. It just looks like a really really bad movie. I haven't read Atlas Shrugged but this movie looks terrible.

yea she takes it a bit far, but if you read her essays you have to respect her logic, she builds a decent case.

problem is her stories...really are bloated, and she writes characters like she has aspergers.
 
Well, politics aside, the book was an excruciating read. Why would the movie be any different?

I agree with a lot of Rand's philosophy, but I don't care for her books. Dull characters and horribly slow pacing.

It's a low budget movie that's sat in development hell for years. It's basically the Duke Nukem Forever of films. What did anyone expect?
 
Bad movies don't mean the philosophy is wrong. It just looks like a really really bad movie. I haven't read Atlas Shrugged but this movie looks terrible.

Oh I'm not criticizing the philosophy I just know that strict adherents to it will think the bad reviews are an affront to their chosen belief system.
 
Kudos for trying, but it is too heavy a load. Atlas Shrugged wasn't so much about the story as it was the monologues. I think a better approach would have been to adapt Rand's philosophy to screen with an entirely different story. Something like O Brother Where Art Thou. Really take liberty with the plot and characters but tell the same basic tale.
 
This is a TeaParty movie. Which Leftist critic is going to receive it well at all? All the Rand fans who have HIGH Standards like it.

Whose opinion do I value more? Leftist bigots and incompetents with axes to grind, or the people actually interested in the material?
 
The book was a poorly written piece of idiot/simplistic potboiler soap opera fluff masquerading as serious philosophy anyway. Most Marvel Comics have more depth and nuance, plus cooler graphics!

It sucked as literature and was even more laughably lame as serious socio-political commentary.

bingo
 
This is a TeaParty movie. Which Leftist critic is going to receive it well at all? All the Rand fans who have HIGH Standards like it.

Whose opinion do I value more? Leftist bigots and incompetents with axes to grind, or the people actually interested in the material?
derp-cat.jpg
 
This is a TeaParty movie. Which Leftist critic is going to receive it well at all? All the Rand fans who have HIGH Standards like it.

Whose opinion do I value more? Leftist bigots and incompetents with axes to grind, or the people actually interested in the material?

and I was right

Oh I'm not criticizing the philosophy I just know that strict adherents to it will think the bad reviews are an affront to their chosen belief system.
 
And once again techs demonstrates a total lack of awareness. Bravo.
Don't feel alone 🙂


http://www.cracked.com/article_19036_too-stupid-satire-how-media-branded-me-as-racist.html
Too Stupid for Satire: How The Media Branded Me as a Racist
(guy posted hilariously racist australia day video)

My first thought, before the coffee hit my brain and I remembered the date, was that my hard work had all finally paid off. 2011 was already shaping up to be a good year. Some book that I contributed to was sitting on the New York Times bestseller list. Now, I was in the media. Happily, I checked in with the Herald Sun to see what the papers were writing about me, already thinking about what price I should demand for my movie deal.

"Anger at bad-taste ocker web clip: A surf shop is under fire for labeling an Australia Day video urging Aussies to beat up and glass homosexuals and foreigners as 'hilarious.' "

"Straya Day" had gone viral again. The video was suddenly up to almost 300,000 views. Someone had complained to the media (but more on that later) and at least one paper was going to pick up this ball and run with it. Of course the worst part is, they weren't simply disagreeing with the way I portrayed the nation. I could deal with it if they thought my satire was simply too biting. Instead, they didn't actually detect any satire.

I was aiming for "so ridiculously racist that nobody could take it literally," but what the Herald Sun saw was "so ridiculously racist, this guy is literally worse than Hitler." Just like that New Yorker cover, there was no way to take the joke to such an extreme that everyone would see it.
 
The book was a poorly written piece of idiot/simplistic potboiler soap opera fluff masquerading as serious philosophy anyway. Most Marvel Comics have more depth and nuance, plus cooler graphics!

It sucked as literature and was even more laughably lame as serious socio-political commentary.

Libertopians, lol.

They're as bad, as shallow, and as righteously annoying as any other messianic true believer who might knock on your door or corner you in a bar and try to sell you something, thrust a pamphlet in your hand, or convert you.

Libertopians. They just think they're deep, like that 14 year old girl with the braces and the unfortunate skin condition who wouldn't shut up in your Junior High School civics class. 😛
Ayn Rand actually despised libertarians. Just saying.

Objectivism and libertarianism don't really have much in common at all. Not sure why the latter always tends to get lumped in with objectivism.
 
Back
Top