All these people should lose their jobs or licenses
http://www.ajc.com/news/investigation-into-aps-cheating-1001375.html
http://www.ajc.com/news/investigation-into-aps-cheating-1001375.html
the program is a failure...... not every kid is the same, they're trying to make it a cookie cutter system
What's the answer? I don't really know, but I know this isn't it.
I couldn't agree more.
Who cares, though. All the schools will fall short if it's really this unattainable.What a lot of people don't realize is that No Child Left Behind puts unattainable requirements upon schools. By 2014 100% of students are supposed to be proficient in math and reading. Even in the best schools that won't happen without lowering standards, or faking it like these teachers and administrators did. Not all kids are capable or care enough to take the tests seriously. Our school is one of the better ones in the state, however this last year we scored 80% proficient in language and needed 82%. Next year that increases to something like 86%. On the other hand we are over 90% in math and in the high 80's for reading, but without an improvement we will fall short in the next year or two. Most of the other districts in the area are even farther behind.
I work in a charter environment and administrate our yearly testing. I make it a point to follow policy. If an adult or student deviates from that policy they are quickly reminded of the rules and / or removed from the testing environment. I'm sure not going to lose my job over someone cheating. Luckily we reward our kids for taking the tests seriously in the form of after ISAT parties. That works for most of the students.
Related article that explains the requirement. http://www.isbe.state.il.us/nclb/htmls/highlights.htm
It is not no child left behind that forced educators to cheat and lie and obfuscate public records. Don't you people dare fvcking blame this on that. It may be a terrible program, it may be useless, but these people voluntarily systematically lied on a huge scale over a long period of time. The lot of them should be exempt from acting in a teaching if not a public capacity ever again and some should face prison, for they did break actual laws.
Who cares, though. All the schools will fall short if it's really this unattainable.
Very well said. These teachers and administrators did this to benefit themselves, not the children who were still left barely literate if that. They were not stealing and cheating for the things the children needed to get a decent education, but rather to ensure that they themselves suffered no adverse effects for the lack of that decent education.It is not no child left behind that forced educators to cheat and lie and obfuscate public records. Don't you people dare fvcking blame this on that. It may be a terrible program, it may be useless, but these people voluntarily systematically lied on a huge scale over a long period of time. The lot of them should be exempt from acting in a teaching if not a public capacity ever again and some should face prison, for they did break actual laws.
This. Every year I have to prepare computers in the schools I support for SOL testing. Everyone involved in the testing process has to sign a form stating that we will report any suspected or observed instances of cheating. The test software itself is designed to immediately exit if any program launches in the background so part of the prep is to make sure there is nothing on the laptops that can pop up during the test and kick the student out. All paper materials are signed for by the exam proctors and all scratch paper is handed out and collected by the test proctors. From everything I have seen despite most of the teachers having major issues with the whole SOL testing process they deal with it with integrity.
Unattainable, no. Something, yes. I hear a lot of complaining by teachers about being held to objective standards and yet the entire damned establishment seems thoroughly inept when charged with finding something that measures their own performance. How would that sh*t fly in ANY other industry or profession? It wouldn't.But we have an example in this thread of what teachers and administrators will do to meet those unattainable requirements. You are right, it will fix itself by 2014, but expect more scandals before then.
edit: also realize that we are pegging teacher performance to those unattainable numbers, is that fair?
Probably so. But I bet you a lot of teachers are not cheating right now, so it's not as if no child left behind is forcing them to do it.to put unrealistic expectations on the the schools and then tie their performance to that benchmark is unfair.
Right so the answer should be to repeal no child left behind.
I think a big problem we have towards government is we expect it to have increasing returns. Realistically there's only so much we can achieve with an educational system. We're not going to be able to turn every lost soul in the inner city into a fulfilled scholar. Everyone shits on the US educational system but by in large serious and smart students are given an opportunity to excel.
At the root, it's a combination of two things:
1. Many administrators/principals would be coerced into cheating by NCLB and similar state-level programs. NCLB lays out impossible school-wide requirements and threatens school closure and/or job loss as penalty for failure to meet the impossible requirements.
2. Many teachers would be coerced into cheating by state-level "pay for performance" schemes. States are increasingly cutting teacher pay and making bonuses and job security contingent upon standardized testing. Let's face it, not all kids are equal. Teachers do get classes of really stupid kids. I've seen it happen. If you're a teacher making $36k and are told "If your kids score X you get $15k and if not you lose your job" that's not a good situation to be in.
What would be the appropriate penalty for theft of someone's future?
That is also part of my role as technology Coordinator and I follow the policies to a "T". But the other part of the problem is the NCLB requirements I mentioned. No school will meet 100% 100% of the time and that will push some people into breaking policy to protect their jobs. I'm not defending those people, but to put unrealistic expectations on the the schools and then tie their performance to that benchmark is unfair.