ATItool accuracy

[Marsumane]

Basically my question is how accurate is ATITool on finding your max core/mem clocks? I seem to be able to play 5mhz core over what it detects as my max on atitool. I cant see any visual artifacts, but maybe im wrong. I had been using powerstrip to oc my 9800p to 413mhz core (incase it matters)

Anyone else have any opionions/experiance with this program?

 

[GeneralGrievous]

It's pretty bad. Nvidia's autodetect is slightly better, but it sucks too.

 

[SickBeast]

IME the latest version is very accurate w/ my 9700PRO. I had already determined my max overclocks on my own over the past year of tweaking, and it basically confirmed what I had the card set at.

 

[Robor]

It was accurate for my 9800Pro. When I used 3DMark2K3 and bumped core/mem up to the point of video errors ATITool peaked right in the same area. However, I've heard (read) some others who warned you can fry your card with it.

 

[Marsumane]

So should i just do it based on multiple runs of Farcry/Halo/3dmark like ive been doing and then test it for a few hrs on games of choice? Its always worked in the past, but i was wondering if this would just be a more definate answer to the overclocking problem.

 

[VIAN]

I never used the find max core/memory thing, but ATITool was very good at finding errors that slipped by me when using 3dmark.

 

[Delorian]

It does take a while, but I haven't let mine finish, I just bumped up to 9800 XT speeds and am letting my system check itself while gaming and running benchmarks. No problems yet.

 

[JeffCY]

I think I did fry my card with ATI Tool. I even had a VGA silencer on it too... but it started artifacting at stock. Had to get it replaced. Maybe just bad luck? A lot of people seem to have good experiences with ATI tool.

 

[LIVAN]

ATI tool artifacts, how do you know it's artifacting?

 

[SickBeast]

It will tell you if it's artifacting. What you see on-screen is irrelevant AFAIK.