ATI's own chick demo! Ruby

[EarthwormJim]

Originally posted by: BFG10K
I hope to see wrappers for all of these demos so that ATi and nVidia owners can enjoy all three of them. Oh, and nude patches for the two newest gals are a must.

Doesn't Nvidia's chick use SM 3.0? If it does then I don't think we will be seeing wrappers for Ati cards.

 

[BFG10K]

We still don't know for sure whether the R420 supports SM 3.0 or not.

 

[reever]

Originally posted by: EarthwormJim

Originally posted by: BFG10K
I hope to see wrappers for all of these demos so that ATi and nVidia owners can enjoy all three of them. Oh, and nude patches for the two newest gals are a must.

Doesn't Nvidia's chick use SM 3.0? If it does then I don't think we will be seeing wrappers for Ati cards.

Unless they use VS3.0 and Ati doesn't have it then we couldn't use a wrapper. Otherwise PS3.0 would most likely be able to be made into a similar, but longer PS2.0 code

 

[PCTweaker5]

Nvidia's chick is way better, she has that good BJ look about her.

 

[merlocka]

Originally posted by: BFG10K
The link to your patch doesn't go anywhere. Is there an alternative link?

Edit: that page is absolutely bloated.

The page works for me, but here is the direct download link.

Text

 

[Insomniak]

Originally posted by: reever

Originally posted by: Insomniak
Hey did anyone read that article?

Nalu has 300,000 polygons.

Ruby has 80,000.

Would anyone care to make unfounded speculation as to how this may or may not indicate that NV40 has tons more juice than r420?

May not, if you visit the B3d boards or if you just looked at that picture Ruby will not be demoed alone and onome sort of background which is static or is repeated over and over to cover the whole screen

Neither is Nalu....

 

[PCTweaker5]

What do you mean neither?

 

[Insomniak]

Point being Nalu is not demoed on a static background.

 

[Pete]

Sorry dude, I have to disagree with you there. I mean given the choice between a nude Gorilla or a nude Dawn I think it's painfully obvious which most people would prefer.
Heh, I waas thinking more along the lines of a tiger or bear. Big cats, sexy; chimps, not so sexy. No offense to chimps, of course, but that's just me.

By the way, I'm not sure I can remember the last time I heard breasts referred to as tatas.
LOL, I was trying to emulate nVidia's four-letter names. I also could have went with Na-lu's boo-bies, but the connection is even more esoteric. Plus, I just think "tata" is the funnier word.

Point being Nalu is not demoed on a static background.
Well, the odd jellyfish in water isn't that detailed. The Ruby pic shows another person, not to mention a more detailed background. It's par for the course: nV likes to focus on a detailed character with a minimal backdrop, and ATi tends to focus on the whole scene. One isn't necessarily better than the other, though nV does pick mroe marketable figures (pun intended ).

 

[Insomniak]

Originally posted by: Pete

Point being Nalu is not demoed on a static background.
Well, the odd jellyfish in water isn't that detailed. The Ruby pic shows another person, not to mention a more detailed background. It's par for the course: nV likes to focus on a detailed character with a minimal backdrop, and ATi tends to focus on the whole scene. One isn't necessarily better than the other, though nV does pick mroe marketable figures (pun intended ).

Not disputing that. :beer: