ATI X1900XT 3D Mark 05 Score!!

[carreragtr]

I am 99.99% sure of the fact that it is photoshopped. But look at the pixel shader scores. It gives a score of 443.3 fps. The x1800xt can't score above 240fps in that test in stock settings.If that part has not been photoshopped then the X1800XT(if that was used) would have to be highly oc'ed,which would reflect in all other tests.

edit: The fillrates are also remarkably similar to theX1800XT(a bit lower).If the whole thing has not been photoshopped(i still think its a fake) then i think we are onto something here..

 

[dunno99]

Originally posted by: phr0m
that looks like the 9 has been smuged out in the screen shot and it looks more like an x1800xt that overclocked to me. You cant see the stock speeds in any screen shots or the real name of it becuase it has been painted over

Exactly my concern, which is why I'm asking everyone reading this.

 

[akugami]

3DMark seems to be good only for seeing how big of a performance boost between one's card and a new version of the same card, such as going from a 6800 to a 7800 or a X1800 to a X1900.We've already seen big differences in performances between competing cards from ATI and nVidia that doesn't translate to real world performances. Likely the next version of 3DMark will be for Windows Vista and DX10. I use it partially as a stability tester and to burn in my video card.

 

[fierydemise]

based on the above screenshot I'm calling BS, looks like a photoshop job

 

[Munky]

If 3dmark05 is not cpu limited past 11000, then something else must be limiting the scores, or else it doesnt scale well with dual cards. When you have a single 512mb gtx score 10000 and then in SLI 2 of those cards score 15000, that doesnt look so good for the SLI system.