ATi vs. Nvidia

Brody8877

Member
Nov 19, 2003
71
0
0
Which Video card card is better? AT-i Radeon 9600xt AT-i Radeon 9800 pro AT-i Radeon 9800xt AT-i X800pro? or Nvidia 5700 Nvidia 5700 Ultra Nvidia 5900xt Nvidia 6800Ultra?
Please List them in ranks from best to ehh...

Why 9800XT better then 5700ultra?
9800xt core speed: 412Mhz
5700Ultra core speed: 475Mhz - 500Mhz
9800xt Ram speed: 730Mhz
5700Ultra Ram speed: 900mhz - 1Ghz
:confused:
 

nitromullet

Diamond Member
Jan 7, 2004
9,031
36
91
6800 Ultra
ATi X800pro
ATi Radeon 9800x
Radeon 9800 pro
Nvidia 5900xt

....I don't know anything about the midrange cards... :)

Why 9800XT better then 5700ultra?
9800xt core speed: 412Mhz
5700Ultra core speed: 475Mhz - 500Mhz
9800xt Ram speed: 730Mhz
5700Ultra Ram speed: 900mhz - 1Ghz

...simply, because they are different architectures. If you are just looking at clockspeeds when comparing ATi to nVidia, you are comparing apples to oranges.
 

Mik3y

Banned
Mar 2, 2004
7,089
0
0
Originally posted by: Brody8877
Why 9800XT better then 5700ultra?
9800xt core speed: 412Mhz
5700Ultra core speed: 475Mhz - 500Mhz
9800xt Ram speed: 730Mhz
5700Ultra Ram speed: 900mhz - 1Ghz
:confused:

do you know why amd is faster then intel at clockspeed for clockspeed? well, its like that.
 

Marsumane

Golden Member
Mar 9, 2004
1,171
0
0
Even thouogh you really cant list all the cards in order by performance, I'll give a rough heiarchy:
6800u, x800p, 9800xt, 9800p, 5900xt, 5700u, 9600xt. This does vary depending upon the game in which you bench them on. Especially when comparing the 5700u and 9600xt.

The 9800xt is better due to having more pipelines, a better archetecture, better iq, higher clocks, more memory bandwidth, etc, etc, etc...
 

TStep

Platinum Member
Feb 16, 2003
2,460
10
81
Given that topic title and topic summary, I'm truly amazed my monitor didn't melt when I entered this post. Not that it is a bad thing.
 

Hauk

Platinum Member
Nov 22, 2001
2,806
0
0
Oh man, given the damn day I've had, I'm glad to have opened this thread... ;)
 

Rankor

Golden Member
Jul 10, 2000
1,667
0
76
Current Generation High Performance

Nvidia 6800Ultra
AT-i X800pro

***********

Previous Generation High Performance

AT-i Radeon 9800xt
AT-i Radeon 9800 pro

***********

Previous Generation High Mid Performance

Nvidia 5900xt

***********

Previous Generation Mid Performance

Nvidia 5700 Ultra
AT-i Radeon 9600xt
Nvidia 5700
 

Pete

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
4,953
0
0
Originally posted by: Brody8877
Which Video card card is better? AT-i Radeon 9600xt AT-i Radeon 9800 pro AT-i Radeon 9800xt AT-i X800pro? or Nvidia 5700 Nvidia 5700 Ultra Nvidia 5900xt Nvidia 6800Ultra?
Please List them in ranks from best to ehh...
Check xbitlabs's Summer Roundup for comparative numbers. Anyway, what's the point of knowing how all of those stack up? Don't you have a single price point you're aiming for, or are you going to buy one at each range (low, mid, high)?

Why 9800XT better then 5700ultra?
9800xt core speed: 412Mhz
5700Ultra core speed: 475Mhz - 500Mhz
9800xt Ram speed: 730Mhz
5700Ultra Ram speed: 900mhz - 1Ghz
:confused:
9800XT: 8 pixel pipelines. 5700U: 4.
9800XT: 256-bit memory bus width. 5700U: 128-bit.

So remember to multiply all of the 9800XT's numbers by two to see how it theoretically compares to a 5700U.
 

ronnn

Diamond Member
May 22, 2003
3,918
0
71
Originally posted by: Aleksandar
Oh come on dude ati vs nvidia its like BMW vs M.Benz

In the sense that BMW and Mercedes are overpriced, expensive to repair and have poor performance? Or in the sense that both are status symbols expressing lots of money, but no brains?
 

EvilComputer92

Golden Member
Aug 25, 2004
1,316
0
0
IMO 3DFX kicks both Nvidias and ATIs ass.

I mean seriously, does anyone remember the raw power of a Voodoo 2? You were like "Da man" if you had one. Every game was meant to run on glide.

Man, I don't think I'll ever see as anything as beautiful as Unreal on a Voodoo 2. The sharp colors, the awesome textures, the incredible level design...OMG!

RIP
3DFX
The way it's really meant to played
 

Aleksandar

Senior member
May 31, 2004
420
0
0
Originally posted by: ronnn
Originally posted by: Aleksandar
Oh come on dude ati vs nvidia its like BMW vs M.Benz

In the sense that BMW and Mercedes are overpriced, expensive to repair and have poor performance? Or in the sense that both are status symbols expressing lots of money, but no brains?


Dude pls if you say that then you dont know a thing about cars am just gonna say this (AMG)
(M3)
 

Gamingphreek

Lifer
Mar 31, 2003
11,679
0
81
The 9800 Pro has 8 pixel pipelines in an 8x1 array (if you will). The 5700U has 4 pixel pipelines in a IIRC 2x2 array. The 6800Ultra has 16 pixel pipelines that can operate in 16x1, 8x2, or 32x0 array.

The 9800Pro has a 256bit data width, the 5700Ultra has 128bit. The 6800U has 256bit.

Yes the 9800Pro has slower clock speeds, however with all the highend stuff it has clockspeed doesn't do as much. The increased number of pixel pipelines and increased data width helps tremendously.

Also they are completely different technologies.

I can go deaper if need be, but it really takes a long time.

This thread is a flame war waiting to happen, CHANGE THE NAME to "Why is one card faster" with a sub head of the card names.

-Kevin
 

Pete

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
4,953
0
0
FYI, you don't have four pixel pipelines with a 2x2 array, you have two pipelines with two texturing units each. The first number indicates pipelines, meaning pixels able to be drawn per clock; the second indicates the number of texture accesses you can perform per pipeline per clock.

The 5700U is supposed to be either 4x1 when single-texturing or 2x2 when multitexturing, but who knows at this point.