• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

ATI rma results after removing hsf?

HardWired

Senior member
Has anyone removed the stock hsf form their 9700pro, had a problem, and then reinstalled it and had a successful RMA with ATI? Just curious how closely they look at that when replacing/rma'ing them.
 
To get an 800MHz o'c out of my 2.53 is astounding, but no, it's definitely not the same or better performance than a HT 3.06. While it is a screamer at 3.3GHz, the HT technology is a whole other story. It's akin to having a dual processor setup. I'm sure a HT enabled 3.06 would easily out perform mine in every benchmark. Even if I were to o'c mine to 3.7GHz, as one member did over in the CPU/O'C forum, I would think the 3.06 w/ HT would beat it hands down.

I would take a HT 3.06 over mine any day, (and probably still o'c it 🙂) but I don't have the $$'s for it. 🙁

A HT 3.06GHz is currently about 3 times what I paid for my o'ced 2.53GHz :Q I read a price drop is coming for the HT 3.06's in early May, but I'm afraid it would still be out of my range. I couldn't be more happy w/ my chip though, for what it is.


If you're looking to pick one up that'll give you this kind of o'cing, let me know, or check the CPU/OC forum. There's a wealth of info there.
 
Originally posted by: HardWired
To get an 800MHz o'c out of my 2.53 is astounding, but no, it's definitely not the same or better performance than a HT 3.06. While it is a screamer at 3.3GHz, the HT technology is a whole other story. It's akin to having a dual processor setup. I'm sure a HT enabled 3.06 would easily out perform mine in every benchmark. Even if I were to o'c mine to 3.7GHz, as one member did over in the CPU/O'C forum, I would think the 3.06 w/ HT would beat it hands down.

I would take a HT 3.06 over mine any day, (and probably still o'c it 🙂) but I don't have the $$'s for it. 🙁

A HT 3.06GHz is currently about 3 times what I paid for my o'ced 2.53GHz :Q I read a price drop is coming for the HT 3.06's in early May, but I'm afraid it would still be out of my range. I couldn't be more happy w/ my chip though, for what it is.


If you're looking to pick one up that'll give you this kind of o'cing, let me know, or check the CPU/OC forum. There's a wealth of info there.

Very impressive. I think you would be the HT in benchmark because multi thread or dual processing only good for multitasking. lol 800 mhz isn't bad. But can you beat my 1700+ that beats the 3000+ in benchmarks? 😀

 
Back
Top