• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

ATi Radeon 4890 Discussion

Page 9 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: thilan29

Is there a performance hit going to either positive or negative?
I would expect a negative value to cause a performance hit, while a positive value should increase performance.
 
Originally posted by: BFG10K
Originally posted by: thilan29

Is there a performance hit going to either positive or negative?
I would expect a negative value to cause a performance hit, while a positive value should increase performance.

Thanks.

EDIT: I tried in Crysis setting it between -3 and +3 and it didn't really affect performance...and no real changes in IQ I could see. I changed it from within ATI Tray tools.
 
These days the setting may well have been depreciated. Back in the day it was popular because AF was either non-existent or prohibitively expensive. Now with 16xAF basically only incurring a 5% performance hit, there?s really no point to a negative LOD.

AF, unlike a negative LOD, increases texture sharpness without introducing texture aliasing, so it?s always more desirable.

Have you tried the texture mip-quality slider in CCC? Setting it low would probably approximate what a large positive LOD would do (i.e. it?ll make everything blurrier and increase performance).
 
Back
Top