• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

ati linux drivers any good?

the ati drivers have had enough problems in windows, but has anyone here used them in linux? ill probably be getting an ati card for xmas but dual boot XP/linux on my rig and was just curious as to how good they were
 
They still leave rather alot to be desired performance wise, but they work (installation is simple, they're relatively stable, etc).

There was a request over at Rage3D for linux driver beta testers recently which is certainly a good sign.

NVidia's linux drivers are currently still /far/ more developed though (it wouldn't surprise me if a Ti4200 outperformed an R9800 under linux ATM).

Oh well, hopefully we'll be seeing some more progress soon.
 
heh...same thought was on my mind, after looking at the HL2 numbers.

i run linux exclusively now, but i'll by tossing XP on a spare drive to play HL2. prolly gonna buy a new card too, cus my gf3 ti-200 ain't gonna cut it i don't think. however, i won't be going back to windows, so if i get an ATI, it damn well better work in linux, and good too.

the nvidia linux drivers are great. so good in fact that i probably won't chance an ATI, even if HL2 runs slow.
 
Originally posted by: StuckMojo

the nvidia linux drivers are great. so good in fact that i probably won't chance an ATI, even if HL2 runs slow.

i dunno

im starting to use linux more and more, but i want hl2 and i want it to play properly. i think ill more likely get something like a 9600 pro and do most of my gaming in windows and use linux for most else. if hl2 leaves me time for much else.... 🙂
 
Originally posted by: rjain
xcript: which drivers are you talking about? ATI's or the DRI project's?

ATI's. I found the performance reasonable under the DRM, but without the S3 texture compression extensions.. yeah, not particularly useful unfortunately.

Unless all you're going to be playing is TuxRacer and Armagetron. 😛
 
I dont know about the newer cards/drivers, but I can tell you from my experience that the newest cards are not supported by Linux (i.e there is no suitable driver @ XFree86). It might be worthwhile to do a little research before buying a card.
Moreover, if you are planning to buy a card around XMas, then you have no problem. Today's top-of-the-line cards will already be oudated 😛
 
Originally posted by: civad
I dont know about the newer cards/drivers, but I can tell you from my experience that the newest cards are not supported by Linux (i.e there is no suitable driver @ XFree86).

Actually, they are generally supported fairly quickly due to ATI having to support the FireGL variants of newer cards. It is then (from my understanding) a simple matter for ATI to add support for the consumer boards.

Click Me
 
Sigh!
Half-sleepy statement from me... should've added that my 'experience' was from events that ocurred 2-3 yrs. ago 🙂

Edit: Just spent a while reading about ATI and Linux. Great to know that ATI actually recognizes that Linux exists 😛
 
Back
Top