• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

ATI chipsets

Piccoro

Member
I'm looking for a good ATI chipset and I'd like to be able to OC pretty well and run stable. Besides the crossfire differences, is it worth it to go to a board with the Xpress 3200 chipset over the other? There is at least $50 cost between a lot of the boards.
 
The Abit has some average overclocking results but if you want extreme results. I would rather go with the ASUS or DFI.
 
Originally posted by: Cruise51
Originally posted by: MegaWorks
The Abit has some average overclocking results but if you want extreme results. I would rather go with the ASUS or DFI.

Actually I've heard the Abit AT8 32X is the best crossfire board for overclocking.
Here is a review with the abit and dfi boards:
http://techreport.com/reviews/2006q3/xpress3200-s939/index.x?pg=17

Nice review there.
To be honest, I'm not a big fan of DFI. I'm probably looking between the Asus and Abit boards.

How's the 8GB RAM support work out? I assume it will slow the DDR speed if there are 4 or more RAM sticks. (not planning on using it but thought i'd ask)
 
With 4 sticks of RAM, all AMD Socket 939 processors (I dunno about Socket AM2) are unable to run at 1T, they must be run at 2T command rate. This has to do with the memory controller on the processors, not the motherboards/chipsets. Intel is different.
 
Here are some of the Abit reviews I skimmed.
Legitreviews (294Mhz)
Techreport (340Mhz)
bytesizedreviews (306 Mhz)
ocworkbench (350Mhz)

Lot of the reviews that showed the Asus and DFI boards also were hitting around 300-340 OC with a low multiplier.
Originally posted by: soydios
With 4 sticks of RAM, all AMD Socket 939 processors (I dunno about Socket AM2) are unable to run at 1T, they must be run at 2T command rate. This has to do with the memory controller on the processors, not the motherboards/chipsets. Intel is different.
Alright, thanks. That is what I thought. Just didn't know if there where any other catches.
 
Back
Top