• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

ATI Benchmark Commentary

Actually I thought it looked a lot like Anandtech's new benchmarking techniques. Which I think are in the right direction. The subjective image of IQ could be addressed by having blind side by side comparisons of images. If you had ten people look at the pictures and vote for highest IQ you would develop a greater objectivity. The problem is some people may recognize ATi or NV w/o any other cues.
 
I think this is an excellent summary with some great information. Definately a big step in the right direction.

I'm talking about the text before ATI's benchmarks. Obviously the benchmarks in there are going to have some sort of spin on there, and they definately do: 1280X1024 with 4xAA and 8xAF is a rather unrealistic setting for most games for either of those cards (9600P or 5600U).

The statistical data and text is very objective and well-researched.

Let's not pan ATI, Genx87 just because it's from that company. How about you read the text and figure out for yourself which parts are legitamate and which part have some marketing spin on them instead of instantly discrediting them for any arbitrary reason.
 
Originally posted by: Genx87
I take it you are probably the same kind of person who would believe shader day was legit lol
Click to expand...

Did you even read the .pdf, or did you just see the acronym "ATI" and think to yourself "biased", as usual?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top