Originally posted by: Parasitic
Slower stock.
R350 and R300 clock-for-clock comparison shows that a Radeon 9800 Pro @ 325/310 (Radeon 9700 Pro stock) performs just about the same, and factoring in that a Radeon 9800np is like 320/290 it'd be slower.
I'd say that test is highly suspect.
First off, they used 2 different drivers. I would have guessed that Anand would have had more sense. Its not like he just started benchmarking last week. "ATI Radeon 9700 Pro (128MB) - CATALYST 3.1 ATI Radeon 9800 Pro (128MB) - 7.84 Beta Drivers"
Here is a link to a newer test:
http://www.techspot.com/reviews/hardware/sapphire_9800pro/index.shtml
They used the same drivers (Cat 3.6) for both cards.
"After some quick n? dirty tests where we underclocked the 9800 (identical clock frequencies to the 9700), it was not any faster at all when no FSAA was used due to the fact that the core improvements as I said above where limited to FSAA modes only. However, when the same test was run with 4x FSAA and 8x Perf AF enabled, the 9800 scored 10% faster than its older brother, thus that difference is purely what the improvements inside the new R350 core brought to the table. When I cranked up the visuals even further to 4x FSAA and 8x Quality AF, the 9800Pro impressively scored 30% faster than its older brother (from 1024 to 1600 resolutions), you will want to take a closer look to the complete numbers however."