ATI 9200np vs.??

Mloot

Diamond Member
Aug 24, 2002
3,038
25
91
I would think more along the lines of a GF4 MX 440. The 9200 non-pro is really nothing more than a Radeon 9000 np with 8X AGP support. I've seen a couple of reviews where the 9200 was barely faster than the 9000 np. I think any respectable Geforce 3 would eat the 9200 np for lunch.
 

selfbuilt

Senior member
Feb 6, 2003
481
0
0
Based on its ancestry (i.e. Radeon 9000, re-vamped and scaled down 8500), I'd say a GF3 Ti200 would probably be the closest comparable. In terms of modern cards, say around the level of a really good GF4 MX or a decent 5200 128MB (without AA/AF enabled).

Can't be more exact, since the speeds and quality of those Nvidia cards can vary considerably. For example, I've seen memory bandwith on GF4MXs vary from 6.4 GB/s down to as low 1.3 GB/s (!), and all indications are that the 5200s have similar issues (especially on the crippled 64MB versions). Make sure you stick with a reputable vendor (and 128MB versions) if you go the Nvidia route.


 

prvteye2003

Diamond Member
Jun 19, 2003
3,876
1
0
Okay, that's good to know. I just bought one in the fs/t forum for 20 bux. I guess I got a good deal then.
 

Pete

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
4,953
0
0
It's a great deal for $20. It won't be faster than a Ti200, except with AF, which may be all that matters for that price.
 

prvteye2003

Diamond Member
Jun 19, 2003
3,876
1
0
well, i got it. it will be replacing the gf2mx400 in my sons computer. i'm sure he will appreciate it(he's only 10)
 

blazer78

Senior member
Feb 26, 2003
436
0
0
well, yrha 20 bucks is a good deal, and since he's 10 i'm sure he won't mind ;) , as for a comparison i'd say a geforce FX 5200 NON-ultra cuz tats very slow...