What's the performance hit when running a swap file of that size?Originally posted by: Otter
Fortuantely, 2T won't cause much of a performance hit. It will certainly be less than the hit for running a 1 or 2 GB swap file.
What's the performance hit when running a swap file of that size?Originally posted by: Otter
Fortuantely, 2T won't cause much of a performance hit. It will certainly be less than the hit for running a 1 or 2 GB swap file.
I would have assumed that he meant that if you needed to keep 3.5GB of data in RAM, it would be better to have 4GB at 2T and keep everything in RAM, than to have 2GB 1T and have to use the swap file as well. If he meant something else, then I stand corrected...Originally posted by: Azsen
What's the performance hit when running a swap file of that size?Originally posted by: Otter
Fortuantely, 2T won't cause much of a performance hit. It will certainly be less than the hit for running a 1 or 2 GB swap file.
HUGE. Even the fastest SCSI drive is a cement garden toad compared to the slowest RAM.Originally posted by: Azsen
What's the performance hit when running a swap file of that size?Originally posted by: Otter
Fortuantely, 2T won't cause much of a performance hit. It will certainly be less than the hit for running a 1 or 2 GB swap file.
Yep, that's what I meant.Originally posted by: ProviaFan
I would have assumed that he meant that if you needed to keep 3.5GB of data in RAM, it would be better to have 4GB at 2T and keep everything in RAM, than to have 2GB 1T and have to use the swap file as well. If he meant something else, then I stand corrected...
Originally posted by: Lord Banshee
THanks guys
Yeah it seems 2T isn't a problem running 1/2% even 5% slower is nothing when running out of RAM. It would be even better if there was cheap 2GB sticks 🙂 🙂