I've been away from the forums and from hardware itself for a while now. Last time I was here, my Athlon 1.2 GHz was pretty much top of the line. Now they've got these Athlon xp's, but I've noticed that they're not much faster than the t-birds, and they run at the same 266 fsb. So what's so much better about them? I don't even pretend to understand chip architechture, but I do understand that there's a lot to improve upon, so just what have they improved upon?
Athlon XP
- Thread starter kcbass
- Start date
Not much faster than the T-Bird? LOL!
<< I've been away from the forums and from hardware itself for a while now. Last time I was here, my Athlon 1.2 GHz was pretty much top of the line. Now they've got these Athlon xp's, but I've noticed that they're not much faster than the t-birds, and they run at the same 266 fsb. So what's so much better about them? I don't even pretend to understand chip architechture, but I do understand that there's a lot to improve upon, so just what have they improved upon? >>
<< I've been away from the forums and from hardware itself for a while now. Last time I was here, my Athlon 1.2 GHz was pretty much top of the line. Now they've got these Athlon xp's, but I've noticed that they're not much faster than the t-birds, and they run at the same 266 fsb. So what's so much better about them? I don't even pretend to understand chip architechture, but I do understand that there's a lot to improve upon, so just what have they improved upon? >>
@ the same speed, the difference between the Xp and T-bird is barely noticable on non-sse optimised programs. WIth SSE programs, the XP leaves the T-bird far behind..
The XP processors have data prefetch or something, a redeign of its layout to reduce power consumption or something, and 3DNow! Professional or SSE or something
The XP processors have data prefetch or something, a redeign of its layout to reduce power consumption or something, and 3DNow! Professional or SSE or something
Ronin
Diamond Member
I'd venture the Palomino core on the XP's would have something to do with the performance difference as well, wouldn't you?
That's not really true, pre-fetching really helps out in the vast majority of situations. So much so that it's interesting to note that AMD's new "PR" system compares the preformace of the Plamano (sp?) core to the T-Bird core, not Athlon to P4.
<< @ the same speed, the difference between the Xp and T-bird is barely noticable on non-sse optimised programs. WIth SSE programs, the XP leaves the T-bird far behind..
The XP processors have data prefetch or something, a redeign of its layout to reduce power consumption or something, and 3DNow! Professional or SSE or something >>
<< @ the same speed, the difference between the Xp and T-bird is barely noticable on non-sse optimised programs. WIth SSE programs, the XP leaves the T-bird far behind..
The XP processors have data prefetch or something, a redeign of its layout to reduce power consumption or something, and 3DNow! Professional or SSE or something
>>TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 23K
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 23K
-
-
Facebook
Twitter