• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Athlon X4 845 ExcavatorIPC benchmarks

C

csbin

Senior member
https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/48wk6q/just_got_my_amd_athlon_x4_845_here_are_some/



it doesn't have an unlocked multiplier

3.5G Base / 3.8G Turbo


4nCeg.png



hMJpS.png



EvZbg.png
 
Last edited:
My 4.455Ghz G4400 scores 2100 / 4000 for CPU-Z benchmark, in 1.75.0.

Edit: More accurately, I just ran the benchmark again, with other stuff running in the background, and I got 2261 / 3956.
 
Last edited:
csbin said:
Carrizo Not L3 Cache
Click to expand...

And this is the part where you add some documentation for what the L3 does in CB11.5 ST scores. The answer seems to be nada.

Lets see how one with 8MB performs.
51135.png


The 6800K is still king of CB11.5 in terms of AMD APUs.

CB115.png
 
Last edited:
More benches would be nice and especially if put against other L3'less AMD chips (Trinity/Richland, Kaveri). And keep in mind that Cinebench have been one of the worst case scenarios for BD architectures (perfomance wise vs Intel).

I think L3 does not have much impact in Cinebench?
 
lixlax said:
More benches would be nice and especially if put against other L3'less AMD chips (Trinity/Richland, Kaveri). And keep in mind that Cinebench have been one of the worst case scenarios for BD architectures (perfomance wise vs Intel).

I think L3 does not have much impact in Cinebench?
Click to expand...

According to the CPU-Z benchmarks posed by csbin, XV has roughly the ST perf/clock of a Sandy Bridge.
 
csbin said:
AMD A10-6800K@4.1 GHz, 1.12/3.56

AMD A10-7850K@3.7 GHz, 1.03/3.6
Click to expand...

Lol, you just confirmed what he said.

ShintaiDK said:
The 6800K is still king of CB11.5 in terms of AMD APUs.

http://www.extremetech.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/CB115.png
Click to expand...

Thanks for sharing. So 4.1GHz Piledriver is still faster than 3.8GHz Excavator here. Quite a bit less than the 20% IPC bump mentioned here:

www.planet3dnow.de/cms/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/cinebench115single.png

Edit: Even assuming 4.4GHz (A10-6800K), still less than 10% faster per clock.

>10-20% higher clocked Excavator is slower than Nehalem @ CB 11.5 (another example).
 
Last edited:
I think the more interesting chips are the upcoming AM4 models, but it's nice to see Excavator making it to FM2 if only in a single chip. That and few synthetic benchmarks aren't worth reading into that deeply. Besides, we've known for awhile what sort of performance Excavator brings to the table from the Carrizo. No magical scaling to see here.
 
Sweepr said:
Lol, you just confirmed what he said.



Thanks for sharing. So 4.1GHz Piledriver is still faster than 3.8GHz Excavator here. Quite a bit less than the 20% IPC bump mentioned here:

www.planet3dnow.de/cms/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/cinebench115single.png

Edit: Even assuming 4.4GHz (A10-6800K), still less than 10% faster per clock.

>10% higher clocked Excavator still slower than Nehalem @ CB 11.5.
Click to expand...


Even assuming？D:


http://www.anandtech.com/show/7032/...ll-gpu-on-the-desktop-radeon-hd-8670d-hd-4600

sSrHv.jpg
 
Based on XV values that Shintai posted and Richland/Kaveri values posted by csbin.
Points per GHz:

Single thread:
Richland: 0,255
Kaveri: 0,256
Carrizo: 0,282 (10% faster than Richland)

Multithreaded:
Richland: 0,87
Kaveri: 0,97
Carrizo: 1,1 (26% faster than Richland).

I assumed that all chips run at their max turbo clocks in single threaded and at their base clocks at multithreaded.
 
Throwing some 2009 Phenom II action in the mix:

41694.png


Still faster than Excavator per clock here.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top