- Jul 3, 2000
- 2,323
- 1
- 0
THG Review
Unfortunatelty the article suffers from poor editing. One example is:
"The most important difference between the Athlon64 and its big brother Athlon64 is the memory interface."
Uh, right. That second "Athlon64" should be "Athlon64 FX".
Despite poor editing, THG at least asks a good question. How good is the memory supprt for the Athlon64 boards. As it turns out, some do better than others. But it leads me to this question that has been bouncing around inside of my head. Why buy an Athlon 64 / Athlon 64 FX when most motherboards do not have enough memory slots to exceed 4GB? What else does 64-bit gain you? I grant that the CPUs themselves are good 32-bit CPUs.
Unfortunatelty the article suffers from poor editing. One example is:
"The most important difference between the Athlon64 and its big brother Athlon64 is the memory interface."
Uh, right. That second "Athlon64" should be "Athlon64 FX".
Despite poor editing, THG at least asks a good question. How good is the memory supprt for the Athlon64 boards. As it turns out, some do better than others. But it leads me to this question that has been bouncing around inside of my head. Why buy an Athlon 64 / Athlon 64 FX when most motherboards do not have enough memory slots to exceed 4GB? What else does 64-bit gain you? I grant that the CPUs themselves are good 32-bit CPUs.