athlon 64 3500 venice vs celeron 2.66

[shimp]

hey neighbors, wonderin which is faster/performs best at stock speed?

thank u

 

[996GT2]

3500+ venice blows a 2.66 celeron out of the water...and then some...

 

[Octavarium]

The 3500 is way better.

Three parrots agree...

 

[burney]

even 3000+ is faster

 

[LW07]

the 3500+ is faster.

 

[Mik3y]

is this a joke? even a duron 1.8ghz is faster then a celeron at 2.66ghz.

 

[imported_g33k]

Anything in the AMD64 line is faster than ANY celeron by a wide margin.

 

[StrangerGuy]

Originally posted by: Mik3y
is this a joke? even a duron 1.8ghz is faster then a celeron at 2.66ghz.

The reverse is true.

 

[dexvx]

Originally posted by: Mik3y
is this a joke? even a duron 1.8ghz is faster then a celeron at 2.66ghz.

Nice lies.

 

[996GT2]

The A64 3500+ is so named because it is roughly equal to a 3.5 GHz Pentium 4, stock for stock. A 2.66 celeron gives up nearly 1 GHz to the P4 and also has much less L2 cache than the p4. Do the math

 

[shimp]

Hey friends,thanks to all for the great wisdom